My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07-12-07 Planning Comm. Agenda
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2007
>
07-12-07 Planning Comm. Agenda
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/1/2008 1:37:34 PM
Creation date
5/1/2008 1:34:51 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
81
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Table 6. Telespot Sign Crash Rates -Expressway Northbound <br /> Average per year Average per year Average <br /> (1/1/1970- (1/1/1973- Percent <br /> 12/31/1972 3/31/1975 Chan e <br />Crashes where <br />the sign was viewable 46.3 42.7 -7 8 <br />south of si n <br />Crashes where <br />the sign was not viewable 8.0 1.8 -77.5 <br />north of si n <br />This analysis shows that while crash rates decreased on comparable sections in the years <br />after the sign was installed, the sections where the sign was visible experienced smaller <br />crash rate decreases. Due to these arguments, the Board ruled that the operation of the <br />sign must be terminated. <br />Wisconsin Department of Transportation <br />Milwaukee County Stadium Variable Message Sign Study -Impacts of an <br />Advertising Variable Message Sign on Freeway Traffic (1994) zz <br />A study prepared by the Wisconsin Department of Transportation (WisDOT) examined <br />crash rates before and after an advertising variable message sign was installed in 1984 on <br />the Milwaukee County Stadium, home of the Milwaukee Brewers professional baseball <br />team. Crash statistics were analyzed for the three years before and the one and three <br />years after the sign was installed. As they are often associated with driver distraction, <br />side-swipe and rear-end crashes, as well as total crashes, were examined for both the <br />eastbound and westbound directions. The sign was much more visible to eastbound <br />traffic due to the stadium's proximity to the roadway and the amount of visual <br />obstructions for westbound traffic. <br />The analysis found an increase in crash rates for all crash types in the eastbound direction <br />after the sign was installed. Most pronounced was an 80 percent increase in side-swipe <br />crashes after the first year of installation. Results in the westbound direction were mixed, <br />with a 29 percent decrease in crashes the first year the sign was in place and a 35 percent <br />increase in the three years the sign was in place. Although no control roadway sections <br />were studied, an interview with the study author revealed that the introduction of a sign <br />on a high volume curving roadway may have introduced enough distraction to an already <br />demanding driving environment to explain the higher crash rate in the eastbound <br />direction. The study author also stated that the study was not able to establish a causal <br />relationship between the sign and the crash rates.23 <br />Federal Highway Administration <br />Research Review of Potential Safefy Effects of Electronic Billboards on Driver <br />Attention and Distraction (2001) 24 <br />The Federal Highway Administration published a comprehensive report in 2001 that <br />consisted of a literature search, literature review and a description of research needs far <br />P17 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.