My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09-13-07 Planning Comm. Agenda
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2007
>
09-13-07 Planning Comm. Agenda
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/1/2008 1:41:28 PM
Creation date
5/1/2008 1:35:07 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
96
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
NORTHWEST ASSOCIATED CONSULTANTS, INC. <br />4800 Olson Memorial Highway, Suite 202. Golden Valley, MN 55422 <br />Telephone: 763.231.2555 Facsimile: 763.231.2561 planners@nacpla nning.com <br />MEMORANDUM <br />TO: Little Canada Planning Commission <br />FROM: Stephen Grittman <br />DATE: July 5, 2007 <br />RE: Little Canada -Dynamic (Electronic) Sign Ordinance <br />FILE NO: 758.10 - 07.01 <br />Background and Analysis <br />This report forwards a draft amendment to the City's sign regulations that would <br />address the use of "dynamic" signs. The amendment material was drawn primarily from <br />the recent Minnetonka ordinance and the study supporting that process. It is important <br />to remember that Minnetonka's ordinance was drafted as a component of a settlement <br />with major billboard operators in the City as a result of the City's action to disable some <br />of those signs. Other cities' ordinances and reactions to the advent of such signs have <br />also been researched, and those experiences have been incorporated into the <br />proposed language. <br />In addition to the dynamic sign issue, this proposed amendment addresses other <br />changes to the sign ordinance that are intended to minimize challenges to the City's <br />regulations on content-based grounds. As a general rule, a city is not permitted to <br />regulate signage based on the content of the sign, due to a potential violation of First <br />Amendment interests. There are some limited exceptions that permit such regulation, <br />but ordinances must avoid this unless there is a compelling governmental interest, and <br />the regulation are "narrowly drawn" to address that interest. As such, the second set of <br />amendments to the sign ordinance in this proposal are intended to alter concerns in this <br />area. <br />Dvnamic (Electronic) Signs. The changes proposed in this amendment are as follows: <br />Add additional language to the Purpose Statement at the beginning of the <br />section to address signage as a means of the public to find its way to <br />locations in the City. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.