Laserfiche WebLink
<br />WSB reviewed the data that was provided to FEMA during the map update process. The <br />City provided topographic information and Letter of Map Revisions to the FEMA <br />contractors. The City also requested that Rice Creek Watershed District submit their <br />technical modeling on the City’s behalf. <br /> <br />Rice Creek Watershed District provided FEMA with a lake level frequency analysis for <br />the Chain of Lakes, hydrologic and hydraulic modeling for Clearwater Creek, Hardwood <br />Creek, Rice Creek, and Anoka County Ditches 10-22-32, 15, 25, 31 and 46. For the lake <br />level frequency analysis, RCWD reviewed all available gage records on the lakes and <br />interpolated the 100-year flood elevation for each lake. For the modeling, RCWD <br />reviewed both the 100-year 24-hour storm and the 100-year 10 -day storm, which <br />simulates flooding caused by spring snowmelt. The higher of the two 100-year events <br />was used to establish the 100-year floodplain elevation and extents. The result of the <br />RCWD studies is that the 100-year flood elevations on the Chain of Lakes increased due <br />to the longer gage record available since 1981. <br /> <br />FEMA uniformly accepted RCWD’s data for the Chain of Lakes, Rice Creek, ACD 15 <br />and 10-22-32. FEMA accepted portions of the ACD 25, Clearwater Creek and <br />Hardwood Creek studies. Areas with approximate Zone A were essentially left <br />unchanged. <br /> <br />Revising the Effective Maps <br />After the maps have been adopted and published, there are a few options for communities <br />to contest the final mapping. The first option would be to authorize a City-wide <br />independent detailed study to determine the floodplain elevations and extents. This is an <br />expensive option and does not guarantee that the results would be any different than the <br />2015 maps. <br /> <br />A second option would be to revise the approximate Zone A areas and establish flood <br />elevations for these areas for future reference and existing homeowners’ benefit. Areas <br />under development are already required to establish a base flood elevation as part of the <br />development review. <br /> <br />A third option would be to enter into the Community Rating System which would allow <br />the City to provide discounted rates on flood insurance to its residents. <br /> <br />WSB & Associates staff will be in attendance at the work session to answer questions. <br /> <br />Requested Council Direction <br /> <br />None required. Information only. <br /> <br />Attachments <br /> <br />1. 1982 Flood Insurance Rate Map <br />2. 2015 Flood Insurance Rate Map <br />3. 2015 Digital Data <br />4. Changes Since Last FIRM <br />5. Example of Structures Affected by Floodplain at Reshanau Lake