|
CITY OF LINO LAKES
<br />RESOLUTION NO. 15-149
<br />RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING 2016
<br />COMPENSATION PLAN FOR NON-UNION EMPLOYEES
<br />WHEREAS, Section 207.04 of the Code of Ordinances requires the City Administrator to
<br />establish and maintain a compensation plan for all positions in the City, which is to be reviewed
<br />and approved by the City Council; and
<br />WHEREAS, this plan is in compliance with Minnesota Statute 471, which is referred to as the
<br />Pay Equity Law; and
<br />WHEREAS, the compensation plan for non-union employees includes a two and a half percent
<br />(2.5%) wage increase, effective January 1, 2016.
<br />NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Lino Lakes that
<br />the following salary schedule by adopted.
<br />City of Lino Lakes 2016 Compensation Plan
<br />Effective January 1, 2016
<br />Position
<br />Minimum
<br />Monthly
<br />Step 2
<br />Step 3
<br />Step 4
<br />Step
<br />Maximum
<br />Monthly
<br />5
<br />City Administrator
<br />$9,189
<br />$9,648
<br />$10,108
<br />$10,567
<br />$11,027
<br />$11,486
<br />Public Safety Director
<br />$8,087
<br />$8,491
<br />$8,896
<br />$9,300
<br />$9,704
<br />$10,109
<br />Finance Director
<br />$7,595
<br />$7,975
<br />$8,354
<br />$8,734
<br />$9,114
<br />$9,494
<br />Public Serv. Director
<br />$7,509
<br />$7,884
<br />$8,260
<br />$8,635
<br />$9,010
<br />$9,386
<br />Comm. Dev. Director
<br />$7,319
<br />$7,685
<br />$8,051
<br />$8,417
<br />$8,783
<br />$9,149
<br />Dep. Public Safety Dir.
<br />$7,084
<br />$7,438
<br />$7,792
<br />$8,147
<br />$8,501
<br />$8,855
<br />Public Safety Captain
<br />$6,621
<br />$6,952
<br />$7,283
<br />$7,614
<br />$7,945
<br />$8,276
<br />HR Manager
<br />$6,068
<br />$6,371
<br />$6,675
<br />$6,978
<br />$7,282
<br />$7,585
<br />City Clerk
<br />$4,984
<br />$5,233
<br />$5,482
<br />$5,732
<br />$5,981
<br />$6,230
<br />Adopted by the Lino Lakes City Council this 25th day of April 2016.
<br />The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was introduced by Council Member
<br />Kusterman and was duly seconded by Council MemberManthey and upon vote being
<br />taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof:
<br />Kusterman, Manthey, Maher, Reinert
<br />The following voted against same:
<br />Rafferty
<br />ATTEST:
<br />i. e Bartell, City C erk
<br />
|