Laserfiche WebLink
CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION April 4, 2016 <br />DRAFT <br /> 2 <br />Ms. Hanke noted the Environmental Board review where they had received additional 46 <br />information. Ms. Thompson explained that the phosphorus concentrations were reviewed 47 <br />at the Board’s request and treatment plans adjusted. Water quality will continue to be 48 <br />reviewed to make sure there is not over treating or under treating based on current 49 <br />practice. 50 <br /> 51 <br />Informational meetings will be held and staff will return to the Environmental Board in 52 <br />May. 53 <br /> 54 <br />2. FEMA Floodplain Map Revisions – City Engineer Hankee explained that the 55 <br />Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) has been updating flood insurance 56 <br />maps throughout the area and Anoka County has now been done. That process has 57 <br />resulted in map amendments and some changes to rules. One change is that lenders must 58 <br />now notify homeowners if they are located in a flood plain as the map data is clarified. 59 <br />There are about 1,500 parcels within Lino Lakes that are impacted and have a structure 60 <br />present on the property. Rice Creek Watershed District had input to the changes. 61 <br /> 62 <br />Mayor Reinert asked specifically what has changed to cause more flood plain. Ms. 63 <br />Thompson said essentially the maps are based on more years of data. Mayor Reinert 64 <br />asked if it is accurate that those new years have been wetter; he would like to understand 65 <br />more so that the city can offer that information to impacted property owners. He noted 66 <br />that he’s having difficulty believing the changes because he’s lived in the city for forty 67 <br />years and has not himself seen such differences as represented by the map changes. Ms. 68 <br />Thompson said, in some cases, properties were removed and in other cases the property 69 <br />was located in the flood plain but not included on the map. 70 <br /> 71 <br />The council discussed the LOMA process (letter of map amendment) that allows a 72 <br />property owner to pass on flood insurance by proving that their property is not low 73 <br />enough to be flood impacted. Ms. Thompson further explained how mortgage companies 74 <br />view the map and the process of receiving a LOMA and the possibility get their insurance 75 <br />premiums reimbursed if there has been no flooding. Staff discussed the content of a 76 <br />mailing to impacted individuals to share information on the process. Ms. Thompson 77 <br />explained the contact she’s had with FEMA giving comments about obvious technical 78 <br />errors; that process would be continued with the support of the Minnesota Department of 79 <br />Natural Resources (DNR) and other cities. Mayor Reinert asked about the possibility of 80 <br />not accepting the map now; staff explained the process up to this point that included some 81 <br />acceptance of the map. 82 <br /> 83 <br />Staff directed to work with the DNR for their support in approaching FEMA to make 84 <br />some necessary changes in the new map. Mayor Reinert suggested that approaching 85 <br />FEMA for changes will be necessary but moving forward there should also be a better 86 <br />communication plan to impacted property owners. The council also anticipates 87 <br />continuing presentations at council meetings to keep people informed and up to date on 88 <br />options. 89 <br /> 90