My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
05-02-2016 Council Packet
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
1982-2020
>
2016
>
05-02-2016 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/25/2018 3:18:47 PM
Creation date
5/3/2016 11:43:20 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Council Packet
Meeting Date
05/02/2016
Council Meeting Type
Work Session Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
101
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Anoka County City of Lino Lakes <br />apportionment of the levy. When the sales ratio studies prepared by the Department of Revenue <br />show that the average levels of assessment in the several portions of the taxing jurisdictions in the <br />different counties differ by more than ten percent, the board shall order the apportionment of the levy <br />unless (a) the proportion of total adjusted gross tax capacity in one of the counties is less than ten <br />percent of the total adjusted gross tax capacity in the taxing jurisdiction and the average level of <br />assessment in that portion of the taxing jurisdiction is the level which differs by more than five percent <br />from the assessment level in any one of the other portions of the taxing jurisdiction; (b) significant <br />changes have been made in the level of assessment in the taxing jurisdiction which have not been <br />reflected in the sales ratio study, and those changes alter the assessment levels in the portions of <br />the taxing jurisdiction so that the assessment level now differs by five percent or less; or (c) <br />commercial, industrial, mineral, or public utility property predominates in one county within the taxing <br />jurisdiction and another class of property predominates in another county within that same taxing <br />jurisdiction. If one or more of these factors are present, the board may order the apportionment of <br />the levy. Notwithstanding any other provision, the levy for the Metropolitan Mosquito Control District, <br />Metropolitan Council, metropolitan transit district, and metropolitan transit area must be apportioned <br />without regard to the percentage difference. If, pursuant to this subdivision, the board apportions the <br />levy, then that levy apportionment among the portions in the different counties shall be made in the <br />same proportion as the adjusted gross tax capacity as determined by the commissioner in each <br />portion is to the total adjusted gross tax capacity of the taxing jurisdiction. For the purposes of this <br />section, the average level of assessment in a taxing jurisdiction or portion thereof shall be the <br />aggregate assessment sales ratio. Gross tax capacities as determined by the commissioner shall be <br />the gross tax capacities as determined for the year preceding the year in which the levy to be <br />apportioned is levied. Actions pursuant to this subdivision shall be commenced subsequent to the <br />annual meeting on April 15 of the State Board of Equalization, but notice of the action shall be given <br />to the affected jurisdiction and the appropriate county auditors by the following June 30. <br />Apportionment of a levy pursuant to this subdivision shall be considered as a remedy to be taken <br />after equalization pursuant to subdivision 2, and when equalization within the jurisdiction would <br />disturb equalization within other jurisdictions of which the several portions of the jurisdiction in <br />question are a part. <br /> Subd. 4.Public utility property. <br />For purposes of equalization only, public utility personal property shall be treated as a separate class <br />of property notwithstanding the fact that its class rate is the same as commercial-industrial property. <br /> Subd. 5.Equalization orders. <br />The Board of Equalization may, pursuant to its responsibilities under subdivisions 2 and 3, issue <br />orders to ensure that the results of local and county boards of equalization are consistent with the <br />objective of state equalization. The board may issue, at its discretion, a supplemental order to <br />amend, supersede, or correct a prior order of the board or an order of a local or county board. The <br />supplemental order must be issued within 60 days of the order to be changed. The board may issue <br />to a local or county board of equalization, within ten business days of the receipt of minutes of a <br />local or county board of equalization, an order explaining the action that the state board believes will <br />be necessary to effect the objective of state equalization. <br />History: (2366) RL s 863; 1971 c 564 s 3; 1973 c 123 art 5 s 7; 1973 c 582 s 3; 1975 c 295 s 1; 1975 c 339 s 8; <br />1978 c 766 s 1; 1980 c 616 s 10; 1983 c 222 s 3; 1985 c 300 s 3; 1Sp1986 c 1 art 4 s 10; 1987 c 268 art 7 s 20,21; <br />1988 c 719 art 5 s 84; 1989 c 277 art 2 s 12; 1989 c 329 art 15 s 20; 1Sp1989 c 1 art 2 s 11; art 3 s 1; art 9 s 9,10; <br />1991 c 291 art 1 s 7; art 12 s 3; 1994 c 416 art 1 s 7 <br /> <br /> <br />21 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.