06-06-2016 Council Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Search

An independent member of Nexia International INDEPENDENT AUDITORS’ REPORT ON MINNESOTA LEGAL COMPLIANCE Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Lino Lakes Lino Lakes, Minnesota We have audited, in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America and the standard applicable to financial audits contained in Government Auditing Standards issued by the Comptroller General of the United States, the accompanying financial statements of the governmental activities, the business-type activities, each major fund, and the aggregate remaining fund information of the City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota, as of December 31, 2015 and the related notes to the financial statements, which collectively comprise the City’s basic financial statements as listed in the table of contents and have issued our report thereon dated REPORT DATE. The Minnesota Legal Compliance Audit Guide for Cities, promulgated by the State Auditor pursuant to Minnesota Statute § 6.65 contains seven categories of compliance to be tested: contracting and bidding, deposits and investments, conflicts of interest, public indebtedness, claims and disbursements, miscellaneous provisions, and tax increment financing. Our audit considered all of the listed categories. In connection with our audit, nothing came to our attention that caused us to believe that the City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota failed to comply with the provisions of the Minnesota Legal Compliance Audit Guide for Cities. However, our audit was not directed primarily toward obtaining knowledge of such noncompliance. Accordingly, had we performed additional procedures, other matters may have come to our attention regarding the City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota’s noncompliance with the above-referenced provisions. The purpose of this report is solely to describe the scope of our testing of compliance relating to the provisions of the Minnesota Legal Compliance Audit Guide for Cities and the results of that testing, and not to provide an opinion on compliance. Accordingly, this communication is not suitable for any other purpose. CliftonLarsonAllen LLP Minneapolis, Minnesota REPORT DATE