Laserfiche WebLink
Lino Lakes Economic Development Authority, Minnesota <br />SPRINGSTED Page 11 <br /> <br />If a parcel is excluded from the TIF District and the Authority or owner of the parcel subsequently commences any of <br />the above activities, the Authority shall certify to the County Auditor that such activity has commenced and the parcel <br />shall once again be included in the TIF District. The County Auditor shall certify the net tax capacity of the parcel, as <br />most recently certified by the Commissioner of Revenue, and add such amount to the original net tax capacity of the <br />TIF District. <br /> <br /> <br />Section V Estimated Impact on Other Taxing Jurisdictions <br /> <br />Exhibit IV shows the estimated impact on other taxing jurisdictions if the maximum projected retained captured net tax <br />capacity of the TIF District was hypothetically available to the other taxing jurisdictions. The Authority believes that <br />there will be no adverse impact on other taxing jurisdictions during the life of the TIF District, since the proposed <br />development would not have occurred without the establishment of the TIF District and the provision of public <br />assistance. A positive impact on other taxing jurisdictions will occur when the TIF District is decertified and the <br />development therein becomes part of the general tax base. <br /> <br />The fiscal and economic implications of the proposed tax increment financing district, as pursuant to Minnesota <br />Statutes, Section 469.175, Subdivision 2, are listed below. <br /> <br />1. The total amount of tax increment that will be generated over the life of the district is estimated to be <br />$2,613,034. <br /> <br />2. To the extent the facility in the proposed TIF District generates any public cost impacts on city-provided <br />services such as police and fire protection, public infrastructure, and borrowing costs attributable to the <br />district, such costs will be levied upon the taxable net tax capacity of the City, excluding that portion captured <br />by the District. The City does not anticipate issuing bonds in conjunction with this project. <br /> <br />3. The amount of tax increments over the life of the district that would be attributable to school district levies, <br />assuming the school district’s share of the total local tax rate for all taxing jurisdictions remained the same, is <br />estimated to be $745,102. <br /> <br />4. The amount of tax increments over the life of the district that would be attributable to county levies, <br />assuming the county’s share of the total local tax rate for all taxing jurisdictions remained the same is <br />estimated to be $795,585. <br /> <br />5. No additional information has been requested by the county or school district that would enable it to <br />determine additional costs that will accrue to it due to the development proposed for the district. <br /> <br /> <br />Section W Prior Planned Improvements <br /> <br />The Authority shall accompany its request for certification to the County Auditor (or notice of district enlargement), <br />with a listing of all properties within the TIF District for which building permits have been issued during the 18 months <br />immediately preceding approval of the TIF Plan. The County Auditor shall increase the original net tax capacity of the <br />TIF District by the net tax capacity of each improvement for which a building permit was issued. <br /> <br />There have been no building permits issued in the last 18 months in conjunction with any of the properties within the <br />TIF District. <br /> <br /> <br />Section X Development Agreements <br /> <br />If within a project containing an economic development district, more than 10% of the acreage of the property to be <br />acquired by the Authority is purchased with tax increment bonds proceeds (to which tax increment from the property