07/13/2016 P&Z Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Search

Ms. Katie Larsen July 7, 2016 Page 5 Clarification was provided in the "Neighborhood Impacts" section, documenting what a typical residential street should/would look like. However, examples of other streets with similar traffic volumes and characteristics were not provided. These examples shall be provided. The Revised Study documented a worst case scenario with the Hokah Drive as a right-in/right-out. This analysis shows that there will be an increase in traffic on Sioux Lane, however the volumes are within typical local City street volumes. 2. Stop signs on Hokah Drive approaching Sioux Lane shall be added to plans. 3. An emergency vehicle access / trail is shown from the end of the cul-de-sac through Outlot E that connects to the existing trail on the north side of Birch Street south of the development. • The trail connection in the cul-de-sac is next to the proposed driveway to lot 23. The location and design of the connection should be completed to insure that it is not mistaken as a driveway. • Consideration for screening or separation from the existing driveway at 441 Birch St and the proposed trail shall be addressed by the applicant. • The emergency vehicle access / trail shall be 10 feet wide and meet a 7 ton design standard. Include a trail typical section in the details / plans. • The proposed trail shall be aligned straight within the easement. 4. Anoka County will allow a construction access off of CSAH 34 for the construction activities associated with the installation of utilities and roadways. This access is to be detailed within the plans. 5. The utility connection at CSAH 34 will require removal and replacement of the County roadway. This construction is to be included within the plans and requires an Anoka County permit. 6. City standard detail plate GEN -25 for Street typical section shall be included in the plans. 7. The existing driveway connection at Sioux Lane needs to be detailed on the plans based on coordination between the applicant and the property owner. FINAL PLAT 1. Additional drainage and utility easements needed in the rear yards of Lots 2-5, Block 1, for conveyance of surface water drainage. 2. Expansion of drainage and utility easements needed in the rear yards of Lots 4-12, Block 2, for coverage of the 904 contour (EOF). S:\CommwityDevelopmmt\Projeas\Plwning Cases\St. Clair Estates\Staff Reports\20160713 PZ (continued Pl3)\2 20160707 Engineering Review No 2 St Clair