My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
2016-009 Council Resolution
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Resolutions
>
2016
>
2016-009 Council Resolution
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/27/2016 4:33:36 PM
Creation date
7/27/2016 2:19:51 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Resolutions
Meeting Date
02/22/2016
Council Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
4) What are the next steps? <br />These draft principles have been distributed to every city and county in the metropolitan area, <br />and we hope to have as many as possible adopt these principles. We are happy to discuss the <br />principles, along with our reasons for wanting reform, with any Board or Council in the area. <br />During the Legislative Session we will present these adopted resolutions to Legislators to <br />illustrate how important reform is to local governments in the metro -area, and we will work <br />with Legislators to advance reform proposals that meet the adopted principles. <br />5) How do other cities do it? <br />Every other major metropolitan area's regional planning organization (see Attachment B), as <br />well as every other regional planning organization in Minnesota, is made up of a majority of <br />local elected officials. <br />6) Is this an effort to get rid of the Metropolitan Council? <br />Absolutely not. Regional governance is important, but it would be more effective and credible <br />with local representation. In the current system, Metropolitan Council members are non- <br />elected individuals answerable only to the Governor, an office that has often been elected <br />without majority support from metropolitan -area voters. The Council, which has the ability to <br />levy taxes on metropolitan -area residents, should be answerable to the citizens and taxpayers of <br />the area it represents rather than a single officeholder and should feature strong county <br />representation from local elected officials. <br />7) Is this a reaction to the ThriveMSP2040 plan? <br />No. Many cities and counties were unhappy with aspects of the Council's plan. However, our call <br />for reform is not a reaction to the specifics of the plan, or to how it allocates resources. Instead, <br />the experience drove home to many what little incentive the Council has to take into account <br />the opinions of local governments. The Council does not answer to the local constituency, but <br />rather to a constituency of one- the Governor. We realized that this was the core problem, and <br />the release of Thrive2040 was the catalyst to renew our efforts to build a coalition for <br />governance reform. <br />8) Is there other support for this? <br />Yes, many other entities and organizations have come out in support for reform. In 2011, for <br />example, the Office of the Legislative Auditor released a report recommending that the <br />Metropolitan Council be composed of a majority elected officials, citing the Council's "limited <br />credibility" due to a governance structure that limits accountability. <br />2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.