My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
07-25-2016 Council Packet*
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
1982-2020
>
2016
>
07-25-2016 Council Packet*
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/25/2018 4:07:39 PM
Creation date
8/15/2016 2:35:54 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Council Packet
Meeting Date
07/25/2016
Council Meeting Type
Regular
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
248
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION July 5, 2016 <br />DRAFT <br /> 4 <br />Street could be involved. Council Member Kusterman asked if there has ever been a 135 <br />return of funds and it was confirmed that there has been; he recommends caution in 136 <br />utilizing the funds because having them go back into the tax coffers isn’t necessarily a 137 <br />bad thing. 138 <br /> 139 <br />Staff confirmed that there is nothing on the agenda for July 11 but three actions that 140 <br />would come forward on July 25 – establishment of TIF Plan, a development district and a 141 <br />meeting of the Economic Development Authority and an action on terms. There is also a 142 <br />rezoning and preliminary development plan. 143 <br /> 144 <br />The mayor suggested that the council should consider if they like the project, if they want 145 <br />to do TIF, if so, the term. He does feel that Distribution Alternatives has been a good 146 <br />business in town. 147 <br /> 148 <br />The developer representatives discussed a tentative schedule for the project, finishing up 149 <br />in spring. Road improvements would be included in that schedule. 150 <br /> 151 <br />Council Member Manthey asked if noise mitigation could be included as far as use of 152 <br />twenty percent funds. Ms. Huot suggested that could be possibile as long as it isn’t 153 <br />aesthetic and is within the district. Mayor Reinert suggested a requirement be included 154 <br />in the development agreement. 155 <br /> 156 <br />Council Member Maher asked if there is a way to include security for employees. The 157 <br />developer representatives suggested that Development Alternatives has a good 158 <br />background and are good to their employees; that being said, the market dictates to a 159 <br />certain level. 160 <br /> 161 <br />Council Member Rafferty said he can see the benefit of keeping a good company and will 162 <br />hear more. 163 <br /> 164 <br />3. Discuss Condensing Units Repair/Replacement Options – Public Services 165 <br />Director DeGardner noted that this question was brought to the council last week – repair 166 <br />or replace two a/c units for the civic complex. Information on costs, equipment and 167 <br />timing is included in the staff report. He noted that the Finance Officer reported last 168 <br />week that there is funding available within the city budget He is recommending 169 <br />replacement. 170 <br /> 171 <br />Mayor Reinert suggested that the city get three bids for repair and three bids for 172 <br />replacement. That information could aid the council in a decision. 173 <br /> 174 <br />Director DeGardner noted a requirement on refrigerant (in the Montreal Protocol Act) 175 <br />that will make the current units unusable by 2020. 176 <br /> 177 <br />Mayor Reinert asked if the city should get a second opinion, other than the information 178 <br />received from NAC who is interested in selling the city a new unit. Mr. DeGardner 179
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.