My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
08-22-2016 Council Packet
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
1982-2020
>
2016
>
08-22-2016 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2018 9:02:06 AM
Creation date
9/7/2016 1:39:55 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Council Packet
Meeting Date
08/22/2016
Council Meeting Type
Regular
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
269
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
4 <br /> <br />4. The developer payments will offset additional costs of utility installation or future <br />operation and maintenance. <br /> <br />St. Clair Estates is consistent with infill policies. The development is within the current <br />Utility Staging Area 1A=2008-2015. One hundred percent of the street and utility costs are <br />privately financed by the developer. The cost, operation and maintenance of the utility system <br />is consistent with the normal costs projected by the water and sanitary system plans. No <br />future utility costs are proposed. <br /> <br />(c) Roads or highways to serve the subdivision. A proposed subdivision shall meet the <br />following requirements for level of service (LOS), as defined by the Highway Capacity <br />Manual: <br />1. If the existing level of service (LOS) outside of the proposed subdivision is A or B, <br />traffic generated by a proposed subdivision will not degrade the level of service more than <br />one grade; <br />2. If the existing LOS outside of the proposed subdivision is C, traffic generated by a <br />proposed subdivision will not degrade the level of service below C; <br />3. If the existing LOS outside of the proposed subdivision is D, traffic generated by a <br />proposed subdivision will not degrade the level of service below D; <br />4. The existing LOS must be D or better for all streets and intersections providing access <br />to the subdivision. If the existing level of service is E or F, the subdivision developer must <br />provide, as part of the proposed project, improvements needed to ensure a level of service <br />D or better; <br />5. Existing roads and intersections providing access to the subdivision must have the <br />structural capacity to accommodate projected traffic from the proposed subdivision or the <br />developer will pay to correct any structural deficiencies; <br />6. The traffic generated from a proposed subdivision shall not require city street <br />improvements that are inconsistent with the Lino Lakes capital improvement plan. <br />However, the city may, at its discretion, consider developer-financed improvements to <br />correct any street deficiencies; <br />7. The LOS requirements in divisions (2)(c)1. to 4. above do not apply to the I-35W/Lake <br />Drive or I-35E/Main St. interchanges. At city discretion, interchange impacts must be <br />evaluated in conjunction with Anoka County and the Minnesota Department of <br />Transportation, and a plan must be prepared to determine improvements needed to resolve <br />deficiencies. This plan must determine traffic generated by the subdivision project, how <br />this traffic contributes to the total traffic, and the time frame of the improvements. The plan <br />also must examine financing options, including project contribution and cost sharing <br />among other jurisdictions and other properties that contribute to traffic at the interchange; <br />and <br /> 8. The city does not relinquish any rights of local determination. <br /> <br />St. Clair Estates meets the requirements for level of service (LOS). A traffic study prepared by <br />SRF Consulting Group, Inc. dated June 23, 2016 provides a level of service (LOS) analysis. The <br />proposed levels of service are not degraded; therefore the subdivision is not considered <br />premature. The existing roads and intersections providing access to the development have <br />structural capacity to accommodate the projected traffic from the proposed subdivision. No <br />street improvements are proposed that are inconsistent with the City’s capital improvement plan. <br />The city does not relinquish any rights of local determination. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.