My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
08-22-2016 Council Packet
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
1982-2020
>
2016
>
08-22-2016 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2018 9:02:06 AM
Creation date
9/7/2016 1:39:55 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Council Packet
Meeting Date
08/22/2016
Council Meeting Type
Regular
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
269
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION August 1, 2016 <br />DRAFT <br /> 2 <br />- Park dedication would be cash in lieu of an actual park; 46 <br />- Floodplain doesn’t impact structures or lots; 47 <br />- Shoreland Management Overlay District analysis is complete; 48 <br />- A variance is requested in regard to the length of a cul-de-sac (for emergency 49 <br />service purposes but mitigated with an emergency access trail); Mayor Reinert noted that 50 <br />a guideline was established for cul-de-sacs because the city was becoming a city with 51 <br />many very long cul-de-sacs; Planner Larsen noted some existing lengthy cul-de-sacs that 52 <br />have existed for many years with no incident; 53 <br />- Findings of Fact are included in the resolution granting the variance; 54 <br />- The Planning and Zoning Board consideration process was reviewed; 55 <br />- Council actions being requested were reviewed. 56 <br /> 57 <br />Council Member Maher recalled when the Foxborough subdivision came to her 58 <br />neighborhood. There was annoying construction traffic during the process but now that 59 <br />the development is done, things have settled down and the traffic of the additional 56 60 <br />homes is not really noticeable. She has a safety concern about Hokah Drive; it’s 61 <br />dangerous to turn onto the street. Ms. Larsen noted that there will be a temporary 62 <br />construction access off of Birch Street. Council Member Maher said she’s heard some 63 <br />concern about the size of some yards and she hopes that the developer will be cognizant 64 <br />of that. She asked about the lot size for this development compared to existing lots. Ms. 65 <br />Larsen said there’s no official comparison but she believes they are comparable although 66 <br />some of the existing lots include wetland which is not usable but add to the size. Ms. 67 <br />Larsen added that the construction would be a single phase probably running a little more 68 <br />than two years. 69 <br /> 70 <br />Council Member Kusterman asked if a speed limit should be considered. Ms. Larsen 71 <br />suggested that speed limits are set by statute and Mr. Grochala remarked that there may 72 <br />be some flexibility on local streets to bring it down to a 25 mph limit but having varying 73 <br />speed limits can be confusing. 74 <br /> 75 <br />Council Member Manthey asked about the distance of the trail to Hokah Drive. Ms. 76 <br />Larsen suggested about 300 feet. 77 <br /> 78 <br />The mayor asked if there was discussion with the county as to access off Totem Trail and 79 <br />end the access at Hokah Drive and Ms. Larsen said it was reviewed. Community 80 <br />Development Director Grochala reviewed the future possibilities with an access at the 81 <br />new street, Enid Trail. 82 <br /> 83 <br />Michael Root, Planning and Zoning Board member noted the work that has gone into 84 <br />bringing this forward. He feels the development checks the right boxes. The emergency 85 <br />access issue is resolved with the trail. One concern is the unknown with the county 86 <br />analysis – with the addition of right in/right out at Hokah there are substantial jumps in 87 <br />traffic counts. Maybe without that information, this is a little premature. Mayor Reinert 88 <br />concurred that there should be adequate knowledge about the traffic flow before moving 89 <br />ahead on a development. 90
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.