My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
08-22-2016 Council Packet
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
1982-2020
>
2016
>
08-22-2016 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2018 9:02:06 AM
Creation date
9/7/2016 1:39:55 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Council Packet
Meeting Date
08/22/2016
Council Meeting Type
Regular
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
269
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION August 1, 2016 <br />DRAFT <br /> 4 <br />space – he wonders, is it the best we can do with this land. Ms. Larsen explained that the 136 <br />developer is maximizing just as was done by the Spirit Hills developer; the lots meet all 137 <br />the city’s requirements. Mr. Stimson asked the council not to gloss over the 500 foot 138 <br />maximum called for in a cul-de-sac; just because the city can, should we? He offered 139 <br />thanks to the council for hearing comments and recalled when he moved into the 140 <br />neighborhood there were sixteen trips per day in front of his home. He asked the city 141 <br />when his street would no longer be a dead end and it ended up being shortly after he 142 <br />moved in. He doesn’t want a similar situation with the discussion about access at Totem 143 <br />Trail – that it just doesn’t happen. Mayor Reinert added that this is an opportunity. Mr. 144 <br />Stimson added that he fears a real speed problem at the straight area coming in. Mayor 145 <br />Reinert said his communication with County Commissioner Sivarajah has indicated that 146 <br />more discussion on a Totem Trail access is possible and he’d like to see that happen when 147 <br />it is viable. 148 <br /> 149 <br />Council Member Kusterman asked about the possibility of adding sidewalks for safety 150 <br />and Mr. Grochala remarked that it would probably be a hearty neighborhood discussion. 151 <br /> 152 <br />A resident of the area recalled her experience moving to a quiet street and the huge 153 <br />difference in traffic when access to Birch changed. She feels this would be another huge 154 <br />change. She suggests also that it would be a similar rude awakening for people who buy 155 <br />on this cul-de-sac to find an access change in the future. 156 <br /> 157 <br />The council concurred that they support going down the path of gaining more information 158 <br />on plans for traffic in the area. It would also be nice to know a little more about the 159 <br />homes that would be going in also. The item was pulled from Monday night’s agenda. 160 <br /> 161 <br />Council Member Maher asked about the process of how developments come forward. 162 <br />She heard there was information including on past Friday updates but she didn’t seem to 163 <br />get that and she had difficulty answering questions posed by residents previous to tonight. 164 <br />Mayor Reinert suggested that sometimes in the past the council gets an update when a 165 <br />development is going to the Planning and Zoning Board; that has been helpful and he’d 166 <br />prefer that. Director Grochala explained that staff has generally done that with a PUD 167 <br />development and have typically felt it best to bring forward a development such as this 168 <br />when the review and more information is in place. The council has generally been 169 <br />informed earlier in the form of the weekly update document. 170 <br /> 171 <br />2. Public Safety Department Fleet – Public Safety Director Swenson and numerous 172 <br />Public Safety staff members were present. Director Swenson reviewed a PowerPoint 173 <br />presentation that included information on the following (presentation on file): 174 <br /> 175 <br />- Police Division – overview of method for size (industry accepted is use and 176 <br />average per miles per year); average miles for past few years were noted; 177 <br />- Administration and Investigation Vehicles, seven are included in current fleet; 178 <br />- Reserve and Community Service – two vehicles that are not fully equipped; there 179 <br />is also a snowmobile; 180
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.