Laserfiche WebLink
COUNCIL MINUTES <br />August 22, 2016 <br />APPROVED <br />212 opposed to high density or low quality development. He recognizes the impact of good development on <br />213 the city overall. <br />214 Mr. Stimson asked about the possibility of closing the access point completely at Hokah and moving <br />215 access to Totem Trail. The mayor responded that is a conversation that should occur when the county is <br />216 looking at making the change at Hokah. County Engineer Fisher said all options are still on the table as <br />217 the county moves forward on review but he can say that they are not looking at full access at Totem <br />218 because there are environmental considerations. While they are looking, all the issues will be discussed <br />219 and considered. What he is trying to convey from the county's standpoint is that there is a plan to <br />220 alleviate traffic as he has presented. <br />221 Mayor Reinert said the city is trying to make sure people have their voice heard on this matter. He <br />222 thinks the issue here is what happens in the future. <br />223 The council discussed postponement; staff explained that the statutory timeline is upon this — a decision <br />224 must be made at this point. <br />225 Mr. Parent noted that the information on the city website suggests that there were two different dates for <br />226 the traffic study data and that the traffic may rise to over 1,000 in consideration. <br />227 Ms. Larsen noted that the May figures were estimates and was used for the study. There was additional <br />228 information was put together but the May data was used for that also. Staff confirmed that traffic was <br />229 not measured in June and that there was speed data collected. <br />230 Council Member Maher suggested that the city's comprehensive plan includes a provision that calls for <br />231 more mixed use to take the burden off of residential taxpayers. She doesn't see that part of the <br />232 Comprehensive Plan supporting this development. <br />233 Mayor Reinert noted that he will probably be voting for this; he doesn't prefer the length of the cul-de- <br />234 sac but sees mitigation with the access trail; the Birch Street change is a factor out there; he noted the <br />235 size of 35 homes and lots. <br />236 The council directed staff to continue to work with Anoka County on their future roadway plans for the <br />237 area and to ensure the city's involvement in those discussions. <br />238 Council Member Maher noted a memo from the City Engineer regarding storm water concerns and she <br />239 doesn't see those concerns addressed in the staff recommendation. Ms. Larsen explained that this is a <br />240 preliminary plat and it's not uncommon for that type of matter to be resolved as part of final approval. <br />241 Mayor Reinert confirmed that the county is on board with the emergency access plan. <br />242 Council Member Kusterman asked for confirmation that sidewalks couldn't be added to Sioux Lane and <br />243 Community Development Director Grochala explained that the addition of sidewalks would be based on <br />244 cost and location considerations involving the residents. <br />245 Council Member Kusterman moved to approve Resolution No. 16-78 as presented. Council Member <br />246 Manthey seconded the motion. <br />247 Council Member Manthey thanked the residents for their involvement and for providing information. He <br />248 understands the traffic and safety issues involved and he feels the county is willing to work on the <br />249 situation and the future will include the involvement of the area and perhaps discussion of sidewalks. <br />250 Motion carried. Council Member Maher and Rafferty voted no. <br />