Laserfiche WebLink
CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL WORK SESSION October 3, 2016 <br />DRAFT <br /> 1 <br />CITY OF LINO LAKES 1 <br />MINUTES 2 <br /> 3 <br />DATE : October 3, 2016 4 <br />TIME STARTED : 6:00 p.m. 5 <br />TIME ENDED : 7:55 p.m. 6 <br />MEMBERS PRESENT : Council Member Rafferty, Kusterman, 7 <br /> Maher, Manthey and Mayor Reinert 8 <br />MEMBERS ABSENT : None 9 <br /> 10 <br />Staff members present: City Administrator Jeff Karlson; Community Development 11 <br />Director Grochala; City Planner Katie Larsen; City Clerk Julie Bartell. 12 <br /> 13 <br />Kolstad Septic System v. City of Lino Lakes: Mayor Reinert introduced Jeff Kolstad 14 <br />and State Representative Linda Runbeck. The mayor said this is a matter that he’d like 15 <br />the council to discuss prior to beginning the regular work session agenda. He explained 16 <br />that a property has a septic issue requiring system replacement. State law apparently 17 <br />dictates who can do that work (it must be a professional or a property owner). He 18 <br />understands that the City has chosen to interpret the state law to say that, in the case of 19 <br />this property and this project, Mr. Kolstad’s 78 year-old dad must be on the bobcat doing 20 <br />this replacement. The mayor said he is calling for discussion of the matter. 21 <br /> 22 <br />Representative Linda Runbeck added that she believes the key to state law is to avoid 23 <br />having an unauthorized/unlicensed contractor involved but if you handle it as a property 24 <br />owner that would seem to be okay. 25 <br /> 26 <br />Administrator Karlson explained that he has reviewed the situation with staff (including 27 <br />the city’s building inspector). They reviewed state law and how the city interprets that 28 <br />“property owner” within that law means the person who controls the property. It’s 29 <br />actually quite unusual for a property owner to ask for this permission – it’s most often 30 <br />done by a licensed contractor. In this case the work was begun by the family members 31 <br />(including Jeff Kolstad) and an inspection by the city did occur. It was found that the 32 <br />work was not being done by the property owner and it wasn’t being completed properly 33 <br />and as well the proper equipment wasn’t being used. 34 <br /> 35 <br />Community Development Director Grochala explained that there has been an amended 36 <br />design submitted. He added that it is most important that the system installed is correct 37 <br />and safe. Normally a licensed installer must do the work but there is an exception for 38 <br />owner installation. He noted state law. He suggested that in this case it is a nephew 39 <br />doing the work. Mr. Grochala added that the house will be put up for sale and a new 40 <br />owner should be able to trust the system put in place. 41 <br /> 42 <br />Mayor Reinert concurred that the system must be correct. He is aware that the Kolstad’s 43 <br />have been paying taxes in the city for more than forty years and have not asked for much. 44 <br />The mayor said there are apparently three things that have turned up wrong and that 45