Laserfiche WebLink
Planning & Zoning Board <br />November 09, 2016 <br />Page 2 <br />APPROVED MINUTES <br />V. ACTION ITEMS <br /> <br />A. Variance for 1558 Meadowview Court for a Porch Addition <br /> <br />Katie Larsen, City Planner, presented the staff report. Staff recommended approval of <br />the variance for 1558 Meadowview Court for a Porch Addition. <br /> <br />Jason Hempel, J. Hempel Services, LLC, submitted a Land Use Application on behalf of <br />the property owner, Mary Meuwissen, for a variance for a porch addition. J. Hempel <br />Services, LLC is constructing a screen covered porch and deck for the property owner. <br />The porch encroaches 1.29 feet (15.48 inches) into the rear yard setback. The property <br />address is 1558 Meadowview Court. <br /> <br />Staff addressed questions of the board including: <br /> <br />Mr. Stoesz asked if the adjacent property owners were given notice of the variance <br />request. Staff commented the City is not required to send notices or to conduct a public <br />hearing. <br /> <br />Mr. Laden addressed the reasons for 30’ setbacks. Staff commented setbacks are in place <br />for density purposes, sunlight, air circulation and other environmental effects. Mr. Laden <br />also asked if the original porch encroached on setbacks, and staff commented, it did not, <br />the purposed porch footprint is being expanded. <br /> <br />Mr. Evenson asked about the definition of a detached accessory structure. Staff <br />commented an accessory structure could be a building such as a shed, garage or porch, <br />but must not exceed a maximum square footage. <br /> <br />The property owner, Mary Meuwissen, 1558 Meadowview Court addressed the board <br />concerning the misunderstanding of setbacks, backyard versus the side yard. <br /> <br />The contractor, Jason Hempel with J. Hempel Services, LLC, 12330 Lindstrom Lane <br />Lindstrom, MN and 30225 Ridgewood Avenue Shafer, MN took questions from the <br />board. <br /> <br />Mr. Laden questioned why this issue happened in the first place. Mr. Hempel replied, <br />confusion of side yard versus backyard setbacks. Also a previous survey was conducted <br />which was being used as a reference but not to their knowledge was not to scale. <br /> <br />Mr. Masonick made a MOTION to recommend approval of the Variance for 1558 <br />Meadowview Court for a Porch Addition. <br /> <br />Motion was supported by Mr. Evenson. <br />