My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
05-01-2017 Council Packet
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
1982-2020
>
2017
>
05-01-2017 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/8/2018 10:58:52 AM
Creation date
5/2/2017 10:44:10 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Council Packet
Meeting Date
05/01/2017
Council Meeting Type
Work Session Regular
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
270
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Anoka County City of Lino Lakes <br />20 <br /> <br />270.12 STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION; DUTIES. <br /> Subdivision 1.Commissioner of revenue constitutes board. <br />The commissioner of revenue shall constitute the State Board of Equalization. The board may <br />adjourn from day to day and employ necessary clerical assistance. <br /> Subd. 2.Meeting dates; duties. <br />The board shall meet annually between April 15 and June 30 at the office of the commissioner of <br />revenue and examine and compare the returns of the assessment of the property in the several <br />counties, and equalize the same so that all the taxable property in the state shall be assessed at its <br />market value, subject to the following rules: (1) The board shall add to the aggregate valuation of <br />the real property of every county, which the board believes to be valued below its market value in <br />money, such percent as will bring the same to its market value in money; (2) The board shall deduct <br />from the aggregate valuation of the real property of every county, which the board believes to be <br />valued above its market value in money, such percent as will reduce the same to its market value in <br />money; (3) If the board believes the valuation for a part of a class determined by a range of market <br />value under clause (8) or otherwise, a class, or classes of the real property of any town or district in <br />any county, or the valuation for a part of a class, a class, or classes of the real property of any county <br />not in towns or cities, should be raised or reduced, without raising or reducing the other real property <br />of such county, or without raising or reducing it in the same ratio, the board may add to, or take from, <br />the valuation of a part of a class, a class, or classes in any one or more of such towns or cities, or <br />of the property not in towns or cities, such percent as the board believes will raise or reduce the <br />same to its market value in money; (4) The board shall add to the aggregate valuation of any part of <br />a class, a class, or classes of personal property of any county, town, or city, which the board believes <br />to be valued below the market value thereof, such percent as will raise the same to its market value <br />in money; (5) The board shall take from the aggregate valuation of any part of a class, a class, or <br />classes of personal property in any county, town or city, which the board believes to be valued above <br />the market value thereof, such percent as will reduce the same to its market value in money; (6) The <br />board shall not reduce the aggregate valuation of all the property of the state, as returned by the <br />several county auditors, more than one percent on the whole valuation thereof; (7) When it would be <br />of assistance in equalizing values the board may require any county auditor to furnish statements <br />showing assessments of real and personal property of any individuals, firms, or corporations within <br />the county. The board shall consider and equalize such assessments and may increase the <br />assessment of individuals, firms, or corporations above the amount returned by the county board of <br />equalization when it shall appear to be undervalued, first giving notice to such persons of the <br />intention of the board so to do, which notice shall fix a time and place of hearing. The board shall <br />not decrease any such assessment below the valuation placed by the county board of equalization; <br />(8) In equalizing values pursuant to this section, the board shall utilize a 12-month <br />assessment/sales ratio study conducted by the Department of Revenue containing only sales <br />that are filed in the county auditor's office under section 272.115, by November 1 of the <br />previous year and that occurred between October 1 of the year immediately preceding the <br />previous year and September 30 of the previous year. The assessment/sales ratio study may <br />separate the values of residential property into market value categories. The board may adjust <br />the market value categories and the number of categories as necessary to create an adequate <br />sample size for each market value category. The board may determine the adequate sample <br />size. To the extent practicable, the methodology used in preparing the assessment/sales ratio <br />study must be consistent with the most recent Standard on Assessment Sales Ratio Studies <br />published by the Assessment Standards Committee of the International Association of <br />Assessing Officers. The board may determine the geographic area used in preparing the study <br />to accurately equalize values. A sales ratio study separating residential property into market <br />value categories may not be used as the basis for a petition under chapter 278. The sales <br />prices used in the study must be discounted for terms of financing. The board shall use the <br />median ratio as the statistical measure of the level of assessment for any particular category <br />of property; and (9) The board shall receive from each county the estimated market values on the <br />assessment date falling within the study period for all parcels by magnetic tape or other medium as <br />prescribed by the commissioner of revenue. <br /> Subd. 3.Jurisdictions in two or more counties. <br />When a taxing jurisdiction lies in two or more counties, if the sales ratio studies prepared by the <br />Department of Revenue show that the average levels of assessment in the several portions of the <br />taxing jurisdictions in the different counties differ by more than five percent, the board may order the
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.