My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
06-05-2017 Council Packet
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
1982-2020
>
2017
>
06-05-2017 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/8/2018 11:00:15 AM
Creation date
6/6/2017 2:19:50 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Council Packet
Meeting Date
06/05/2017
Council Meeting Type
Work Session Regular
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
255
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Arlo Lane Stop Sign Review 2 | Page <br /> <br /> <br />Based on these conditions and factors, the potential intersection control can be evaluated and the <br />appropriate signage determined. <br /> <br />Traffic Control Evaluation <br /> <br />Several techniques have been developed to determine what type of intersection control is <br />warranted at specific locations. The procedures evaluating the need and location of all-way stop <br />sign control can be found in the Minnesota Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices <br />(MnMUTCD), Section 2B-5. <br /> <br />It is the policy of the City of Lino Lakes to follow the MnMUTCD when considering the <br />installation of traffic control devices such as Stop Signs. The warrants found in the MnMUTCD <br />include the following: <br /> <br />All-way stop sign control: <br /> <br />1. Where traffic signals are warranted and urgently needed, the all-way stop can be an <br />interim measure or; <br /> <br />2. Crash problem indicating that five or more reported accidents of a type susceptible to <br />correction by a multi-way stop sign installation in a 12-month period or; <br /> <br />3. Minimum traffic volumes: <br />a. A total vehicular volume entering the intersection from approaches must average <br />at least 300 vehicles per hour for any eight hours of an average day and; <br />b. The combined vehicular and pedestrian volume from the minor street or highway <br />must average at least 200 units per hour for the same eight hours, with an average <br />delay to minor street vehicular traffic of at least 30 seconds per vehicle during the <br />maximum hour but; <br />c. When the 85% approach speed of the major street traffic exceeds 40 MPH, the <br />requirements can be reduced to 70%. <br /> <br />The analysis procedures as outlined in the MnMUTCD were reviewed and the follow <br />conclusions were made based on the traffic characteristics: <br /> <br />1. Topography: Based on both horizontal and vertical sight distance requirements for a <br />30 mph street, all approaches to the intersections of Arlo Lane at Highland Drive and <br />Arlo Lane at Joseph Court meet these requirements. <br /> <br /> <br />2. Traffic and Pedestrian Volumes: Existing traffic volume data was collected at the <br />intersections on April 18 and 19, 2017. The counts were conducted for each approach <br />using video cameras. The results of the traffic counts are shown below in Table 1 and <br />pedestrian counts in Table 2. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.