02/08/2017 P&Z Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Search

Planning & Zoning Board February 08, 2017 Page 3 APPROVED MINUTES Mr. Laden asked if lighting is proposed on site and if it should be addressed in the CUP. Ms. Larsen states there is no new lighting proposed or existing, and if any new lighting were proposed in the future, staff could administratively approve lighting by reviewing a photometric plan that meets the City’s ordinance. Rose Lorsung from Recreate Real Estate, LLC was present. Rose explained the existing fence is relatively new, and wish they would have caught the open and outdoor storage requirement before the fence was installed. The height restriction should be discussed in the case of selling the property in the future, since the property is zoned light industrial, the height restriction could create issues for attracting future tenants. Mr. Laden asked how the open area is proposed to be used. Rose explained it will not be used for any purpose at this time other than open area to meet pervious surface cover. Mr. Laden also asked if the storage area will be fenced or the entire property. Rose commented they will look into a cost benefit analysis. Mr. Masonick asked about the landscaping near the ponding area. Rose explained there are trees and bushes that meet the landscaping ordinance including seeding. Mr. Stoesz asked how the stormwater will be directed toward the pond. Mark Jay, 4411 Morningside Avenue, Vadnais Heights spoke on the issue. Mr. Jay explained the lot will be graded from the south to the north, and the slope will drain toward the pond. No curb and gutter is planned. Acting Chair Root declared the Public Hearing open at 7:02 p.m. There was no one present to speak. Mr. Stoesz made a MOTION to close the Public Hearing at 7:03 p.m. Motion was supported by Mr. Stimpson. Motion carried 5-0 (Root abstained). Mr. Evenson had a question regarding the open area. Ms. Larsen explained it is being proposed as untouched and left as is, and bollards or signs will be placed so storage is not placed out of the designated storage area. Mr. Grochala expressed concerns with the open area not having any planned vegetation, because it will grow weeds and other unaesthetic vegetation. Irrigation would not be required. The area should be maintained grass or natural seeding, Mr. Laden agreed. Mr. Laden discussed height of storage containers because of the site being near residential and school property. Outdoor storage would not typically be the desired use in this area so a height restriction should be put into place. Mr. Grochala explained the different approaches that could be taken. Mr. Stimpson expressed concern of having the maximum height of storage taller than the fence requirement, which is not sufficient, and recommends a 17 feet maximum height. Mr. Grochala agreed with Mr. Stimpson on the 17 feet maximum height.