My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
2016-145 Council Resolution
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Resolutions
>
2016
>
2016-145 Council Resolution
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/14/2017 11:59:59 AM
Creation date
6/12/2017 2:01:19 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Resolutions
Meeting Date
10/24/2016
Council Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
31
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Summary: <br />Lino Lakes City, Minnesota; Appropriations; <br />General Obligation <br />Credit Profile <br />US$1.98 mil taxable GO imp rfdg bnds ser 2016B due 02/01/2021 <br />Long Term Rating AA/Stable <br />US$1.6 mil GO tax abatement rfdg bnds ser 2016C due 02/01/2023 <br />Long Term Rating AA/Stable <br />US$1.42 mil GO wtr util rev bnds ser 2016A due 02/01/2027 <br />Long Term Rating AA/Stable <br />Lino Lakes City GO <br />Long Term Rating <br />Rationale <br />AA/Stable <br />New <br />New <br />New <br />Affirmed <br />S&P Global Ratings assigned its 'AA' underlying rating to Lino Lakes City, Minn.'s series 2016A general obligation (GO) <br />water utility revenue bonds, 2016B taxable GO improvement refunding bonds, and 2016C GO tax abatement refunding <br />bonds. At the same time, we affirmed our 'AA' underlying rating on the city's outstanding GO debt and affirmed our <br />'AA-' rating on the city's outstanding appropriation debt. The outlook on all ratings is stable. <br />We rate the series 2015 lease revenue bonds one notch lower than the city's GO debt because of the annual <br />appropriation risk associated with the bonds. <br />A pledge of the city's full -faith -credit -and -resources and its unlimited property tax pledge secure the bonds. For the <br />2016A bonds the city has pledged net revenues of the water utility system, for the 2016B bonds the city has pledged <br />special assessments against benefitted properties, and for the 2016C bonds the city has also pledged tax abatement <br />revenues though our rating on all series is on the unlimited tax pledged. It is our understanding that bond proceeds <br />from the 2016A bonds will be used to finance water system improvements and the 2016B and 2016C bond proceeds <br />will be used to refund existing GO debt for interest cost savings only. <br />The ratings reflect our assessment of the following factors: <br />• Strong economy, with access to a broad and diverse metropolitan statistical area (MSA); <br />• Strong management, with "good" financial policies and practices under our financial management assessment <br />(FMA) methodology; <br />• Strong budgetary performance, with operating results that we expect could improve in the near term relative to <br />fiscal 2015, which closed with an operating surplus in the general fund but an operating surplus at the total <br />governmental fund level in fiscal 2015; <br />• Very strong budgetary flexibility, with an available fund balance in fiscal 2015 of 67% of operating expenditures; <br />• Very strong liquidity, with total government available cash at 2.7x total governmental fund expenditures and 10.7x <br />WWW.STANDARDANDPOORS.COM/RATINGSDIRECT OCTOBER 21, 2016 2 <br />1741666 I 302253518 <br />Th <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.