Laserfiche WebLink
PLANNING & ZONING BOARD <br />MAY 8, 1996 <br />6. Signage shall conform to the City's Sign Ordinance and proper permits <br />obtained prior to installation. <br />7. Netting serving the golf range shall be durable and secured to poles subject <br />to approval of the City Engineer. A detail of the fencing/netting shall be <br />provided for City review. <br />8. A public hearing shall be set to add golf course/driving range as an interim <br />use to the R -BR Zoning District. <br />9. Other conditions as imposed by the City. <br />10. Handicapped parking shall be provided and an alternate site for future <br />parking needs. <br />Mr. Johnson seconded the motion and amended it to include condition No. 11., that <br />major facilities on the property shall be removed if the business is discontinued for one <br />year, or the cost of removal shall be assessed to the property. <br />Mr. Gelbmann accepted the amendment. The motion carried 6-0-1. Mr. Robinson <br />abstained. <br />Chair Schaps called a five-minute recess to the meeting at 8:25 p.m. He left the meeting at this <br />time. <br />Acting Chair Johnson reconvened the meeting at 8:32 p.m. Economic Development Director, <br />Brian Wessel, arrived. <br />VI. DISCUSSION ITEMS <br />A. Bruce Hanson, Rezone GB Property to R1, PDO to Allow Residential Homes with <br />Sea Plane Hangars, Aqua Lane <br />Ms. Wyland stated that a portion of Aqua Lane has previously been considered by the <br />Board for rezoning to General Business. The matter was tabled. Mr. Bruce Hanson, who <br />owns the sea plane base, would like to purchase the property and rezone a portion of it to <br />R1, single family residential to allow homes to be constructed with hangars for sea planes <br />that would have a common access to the landing strip on the sea plane base. <br />Ms. Wyland further stated that the City has a Resolution discouraging commercial <br />properties from being rezoned to lesser uses. However, after considering many factors of <br />Mr. Hanson's proposal and the location of this particular site, it may be a more <br />appropriate land use for the area than General Business. A full staff review will be <br />presented at the June 1996 meeting. <br />Mr. Johnson noted a substantial amount of wetland on Lot No. 6, which is landlocked. <br />11 <br />