Laserfiche WebLink
COUNCIL MEETING MAY 13, 1996 <br />Mr. Hawkins explained that he and the developer's attorney have attended all meetings <br />with the developer and City staff and a tentative agreement was drafted. The tentative <br />agreement has not been signed by the developer. Mr. Hawkins said that he has followed <br />up on this matter with a telephone call last week and still the agreement remains <br />unsigned. He felt that since there is no incentive for the developer to sign the agreement, <br />the City should close the public hearing and then order the improvement according to the <br />terms of the City Charter and assess the developer the amount that is included in the <br />tentative agreement. Mr. Hawkins was asked why the Trapper's Crossing project was not <br />stopped until this matter is resolved. Mr. Hawkins explained that the contractor did sign <br />the development agreement for the Trapper's Crossing development itself which includes <br />payment to the City of $250,000.00 for the 12th Avenue/Holly Drive improvement. The <br />City is now asking for payment of $285,000.00 based on the feasibility report for 12th <br />Avenue/Holly Drive and Mr. Hokanson is saying that he wants language included in the <br />agreement stating that there will be no further assessment to all phases of Trapper's <br />Crossing. <br />Council Member Bergeson noted that the last page of the "green sheet" shows proposed <br />entrances for future phases for Trapper's Crossing. However, it appears that the <br />improved road will only service two (2) of these entrances. He asked will there be <br />improvements on Holly Drive to serve the remaining entrances. Mr. Ahrens said no only <br />minor improvements such as turn lanes. Council Member Bergeson asked why staff did <br />not prepare an agreement that would include an improved roadway to service all of the <br />entrances. Mr. Ahrens explained that the feasibility report determined the cost to <br />improve 12th Avenue/Holly Drive was considerably more than the initial estimate. Staff <br />determined that the amount that could be assessed to the developer would only cover <br />costs to a certain section of the roadway. Staff also was aware that the assessment could <br />not exceed the benefit to the developers property. Mr. Hawkins explained that the cost of <br />the improvements to the developer will be spread out over all 110 of his lots. If the <br />individual lot assessments are high, the City would have a difficult time proving the <br />benefit to each lot. <br />Council Member Lyden moved to continue the public hearing to the next regular Council <br />meeting and to reconsider this matter at the next Council work session. Council Member <br />Kuether seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. <br />Mayor Landers left the Council meeting at 7:10 to attend a D.A.R.E graduation <br />ceremony. <br />CONSIDERATION OF RESOLUTION NO. 96 - 45 ACCEPTING A DONATION <br />FROM THE CENTENNIAL FIRE RELIEF ASSOCIATION FOR THE D.A.R.E <br />PROGRAM <br />Mr. Schumacher explained that the goal of the City is to insure that the D.A.R.E Program <br />will be totally funded through donations from the community. The Centennial Fire Relief <br />Association is aware of this goal and has donated $2,000.00 toward the cost of <br />PAGE 4 <br />