My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
01/10/1996 P&Z Packet
LinoLakes
>
Advisory Boards & Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Board
>
Packets
>
1996
>
01/10/1996 P&Z Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/7/2017 12:15:41 PM
Creation date
7/3/2017 2:53:09 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
P&Z
P&Z Document Type
P&Z Packet
Meeting Date
01/10/1996
P&Z Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
36
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
In recognition of these concerns, consideration should be given to either applying a less <br />intensive commercial zoning designation to the property (i.e., NB, Neighborhood Business <br />or LB, Limited Business) or postponing consideration until such time as a specific use is <br />proposed. <br />Performance Standards. As part of future processing and future development upon the <br />subject site, all applicable City performance standards must be met. <br />Property Values. Considering that commercial land uses typically generate a greater <br />property tax return than multiple family residential uses, the proposed use is not expected <br />to lower area property values. <br />Traffic. Traffic generated by future commercial use of the subject site is believed to be <br />within the capabilities of County Road 49 and Aqua Lane which serve the property. <br />Public Services. As part of the rezoning consideration, findings should be made that the <br />proposed use will not overburden the City's public service capacity. The subject site lies <br />within the Metropolitan Urban Service Area. Commercial use of the subject property is not <br />expected to overburden the City's service capacity. This item will be subject to review and <br />recommendation by the City Engineer. <br />CONCLUSION <br />Decisions relating to land use appropriateness are considered matters of City policy to be <br />determined by City officials. While a possible expansion of the City's tax base is generally <br />consistent with Comprehensive Plan policy, the fact that the future use of the subject <br />property is unknown at this time raises potential compatibility concerns. In recognition of <br />such issues, consideration should be given to the processing options identified in the <br />Executive Summary of this report. <br />pc: Randy Schumacher <br />5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.