Laserfiche WebLink
AGENDA ITEM V I <br />STAFF ORIGINATOR Mary Kay Wyland <br />DATE June 6, 1996 <br />TOPIC 96-21-V, Gary Sandahl, 478 Lonesome Pine, <br />Variance <br />Mr. Gary Sandahl is requesting a Variance from Section 4, Subd. 31 <br />Swimming Pools (1) (D) which states: <br />The pool filter unit, pump heating unit and any noise <br />making mechanical equipment shall be located at least 35 <br />feet from any adjacent or nearby residence and not closer <br />than 10 feet to any lot line. <br />The Planning and Zoning Board may recall that the proposed Zoning <br />Ordinance has been modified under the swimming pool section by <br />deleting the "35 feet from any adjacent or nearby residence" <br />reference but keeping the 10 foot setback requirement. <br />The proposed pool is currently located in a position that does not <br />allow the property owner full view of the pool area from the <br />kitchen area of the home as it must be located 25' from the <br />property line to maintain a 35' distance from the adjoining <br />residence. The applicant would like to locate the pool 10' from <br />the side property line which would place it 20' from the adjoining <br />residence. This would require a variance of 15' from the existing <br />ordinance. No variance would be required if the proposed ordinance <br />were approved as revised: For your information, the applicant does <br />intend to locate the pool equipment adjacent to his existing <br />residence. <br />The Findings of Fact to consider in review of a Variance <br />application include the following. <br />A. That the property in question cannot be put to a <br />reasonable use if used under the conditions allowed by <br />the official controls. The pool could be located within <br />the required setback, however, full view would not be <br />available from within the home. <br />B. That the plight of the landowner is due to <br />circumstances unique to his property not created by the <br />land owner. There are no unique characteristics to this <br />reques t . <br />C. That the hardship is not due to economic <br />Considerations alone and when a reasonable use of the <br />property exists under the terms of the ordinance. The <br />applicant could consider a smaller sized pool or locating <br />the pool in a different area on the property al though it <br />May be more costly. <br />