Laserfiche WebLink
CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA <br />MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS <br />DECEMBER 31, 2015 <br />FINANCIAL ANALYSIS OF THE GOVERNMENT'S FUNDS (CONTINUED) <br />Proprietary funds — The City of Lino Lakes' proprietary funds provide the same type of information found <br />in the government -wide financial statements, but in more detail. <br />The water fund has total net position at year-end of $20,401,628, of which $5,822,834 is unrestricted. The <br />increase in net position of $1,579,872 was primarily due to capital contributions, partially offset by a net <br />operating loss. <br />Total net position in the sewer fund at the end of 2015 was $23,398,831, of which $8,849,796 was <br />unrestricted. The increase in net position of $854,246 was primarily due to capital contributions, partially <br />offset by a net operating loss for the year. <br />The water rates, which reflect water conservation efforts through a tiered rate structure, and sewer rates <br />were adjusted by 2% and 3%, respectively, in 2015. A review of utility rates is planned for 2016. <br />GENERAL FUND BUDGETARY HIGHLIGHTS <br />The original budget was amended several times during the year reflecting increases in business license <br />revenue, building permit revenue, MSA maintenance aid, lease revenues and SCORE grants; reductions <br />in police revenues and fines and forfeits; and reallocating resources within the original budget. The final <br />amended budget is $148,650 greater than the original adopted budget. <br />Revenues were $51,277 over budget for the year. Fiscal disparities revenues came in under budget by <br />$178,439. This variance was more than offset by greater than anticipated license and permit revenues as <br />well as intergovernmental state aid revenues. <br />Expenditures came in under budget by $374,464 due to many factors including lower than expected <br />personal services costs from vacant positions. Fuel costs were much lower than anticipated and <br />spending on contractual services was lower overall from budgeted levels primarly due to contracted storm <br />system maintenance that was delayed in 2015. There were also transfers from the general fund of <br />$590,245. This resulted in a net fund balance increase of $639,878 for the fiscal year, compared to the <br />planned reduction of $170,000. <br />19 <br />