My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
07/12/1995 P&Z Packet
LinoLakes
>
Advisory Boards & Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Board
>
Packets
>
1995
>
07/12/1995 P&Z Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/17/2017 9:57:34 AM
Creation date
7/7/2017 9:49:29 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
P&Z
P&Z Document Type
P&Z Packet
Meeting Date
07/12/1995
P&Z Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
49
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
SECTION 4 - GENERAL PROVISIONS <br />Subd. 1. Application of this Ordinance <br />1. Relation to Comprehensive Plan. Comprehensive Plan relates to land use policy. <br />Ordinance should be administered with due consideration of the plan. <br />2. Uses Not Provided for Within Zoning Districts. The Zoning Ordinance should include a <br />provision which specifies how the handling of uses not specifically listed as permitted or <br />denied are to be handled. <br />3. Authority. A reference should be included in the Ordinance of the State Statute granting <br />the City zoning authority (Municipal Planning Act). <br />4. Repeal. As part of the Ordinance update, a statement repealing the existing Ordinance <br />should be included. <br />Subd. 3. Non -Conforming Uses and Structures <br />This section of the existing Zoning Ordinance is relatively complete. There are, however, a <br />number of text additions which should be incorporated as indicated below: <br />1. The section should include a statement of purpose. <br />2. The City may wish to consider the allowance of non -conforming single family dwelling <br />unit expansion via conditional use permit. <br />3. The existing Ordinance specifies that a non -conforming structure damaged less than 75 <br />percent of its market value may be reconstructed in its previous non -conforming state. In <br />comparison to other municipalities, the 75 percent threshold is considered relatively high. <br />This issue should be subject to discussion. <br />4. The Ordinance update should include a provision that states something to the effect that <br />if a non -conforming use is discontinued for a specified time period (i.e., six months), the <br />use may only be re-established in conformance with current Ordinance standards. <br />Subd. 4. Home Occupations <br />As part of an Ordinance update, this section should be expanded to address the following: <br />• <br />• <br />• <br />Statement of Purpose <br />Define Permitted Home Occupations <br />Permit Processing Procedures <br />3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.