Laserfiche WebLink
NOV-83-1995 OD: 19 <br />Recommendation <br />NAC 612 595 9837 P.03 <br />Based on the following review, our office recommends the following: <br />1. Approval of a conditional use permit (amendment) to allow the expansion of a <br />church within an R-1 zone subject to the following conditicins. <br />a_ The Anoka County Highway Department and City Engineer provide <br />commentirecommendation in regard to the need for Elm Street <br />improvements necessary to accommodate increased area traffic volumes <br />(i,e., right-of-way widths, site access, tum lanes, etc.). <br />b. Consideration is given to the removal of the site's easternmost access point <br />(east of original church) to further limit access to a high volume roadway and <br />rectify a jogged street intersection condition in the area_ <br />c. The site plan is modified to illustrate specific trash handling teas All <br />waste, refuse or garbage shall be kept in an enclosed building or container <br />designed for such purposes. <br />Consideration is given eliminating the row of parking stalls abutting Elm <br />Street and devoting such area to green space. <br />e. The site plan is modified to illustrate exterior lighting locations_ All lighting <br />shall be hooded and directed so as not to infringe on neighboring residentiai <br />uses and public rights-of-way_ <br />If any new signage is to be erected, a sign plan is submitted which specifies <br />the location, type and size of all proposed signs. All site signage shall be <br />required to comply with applicable provisions of the City Sign Ordinance. <br />g. The submitted grading and drainage plan is subject to review and approval <br />by the City Engineer. Such review should specifically address the need for <br />drainage easement establishment over the site's ponding area The <br />applicant shall be required to demonstrate that the proposed development <br />will have no wetland impact. <br />h. The submitted utility plan is subject to review and approval by the City <br />Engineer. Such review should specifically address details relating to septic <br />system removal and well capping. <br />i. The City Engineer and Anoka County Highway Department provide comment <br />in regard to the proposed roadway easement acceptability. <br />2 <br />