Laserfiche WebLink
NOV--03-1995 09=22 NAC 612 595 9837 P.11 <br />In consideration of this matter, we feel the granting of the requested variance may be <br />justified due to the following: <br />1. Disregarding the site's zoning designation, a + 20 acre site such as that in question <br />would be allowed an accessory building size not greater than the foundation of the <br />principal building. The size of the subject site and proposed structure setbacks <br />essentially remove the potential for adverse impact from the accessory building <br />2. Recognition of accessory storage needs of non-residential uses in R-1 zoning <br />districts is in keeping with the spirit and intent of the ordinance. <br />2_ If the City chooses to grant the requested variance, it is our recommendation that <br />staff be directed to (as part of the pending ordinance update) pursue an ordinance <br />amendment which addresses the accessory building needs of non-residential uses <br />(i.e., churches, parks, schools, golf courses) allowed within the City's residential <br />districts. Such amendment will ensure equitable future treatment in this matter_ <br />CONCLUSION <br />Based on the preceding review, our office recommends approval of the following: <br />1. Conditional use permit amendment to allow the expansion of a church within an R- <br />1 zoning district <br />2. Variance to allow an accessory building greater than 1,100 square feet within an <br />R-1 zoning district. <br />Approval of the forementioned should, however, be contingent upon satisfaction of the <br />conditions listed in the Executive Summary of this report. <br />pc: Randy Schumacher <br />10 <br />