My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
01/12/1994 P&Z Packet
LinoLakes
>
Advisory Boards & Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Board
>
Packets
>
1994
>
01/12/1994 P&Z Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/7/2017 12:21:55 PM
Creation date
7/7/2017 10:34:46 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
P&Z
P&Z Document Type
P&Z Packet
Meeting Date
01/12/1994
P&Z Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
63
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
AGENDA ITEM IV G <br />STAFF ORIGINATOR Mary Kay Wyland <br />DATE January 12, 1994 <br />TOPIC James Keefe, Minor Subdivision <br />6300 Rolling Hills Drive <br />8ACKQROUND <br />Mr. Keefe is the owner of approximately37.5 acres of property at <br />the north end of Rolling Hills Drive. The property is Zoned Rural - <br />Executive and utilities are not available to serve the site. His <br />home currently sits on this parcel of property and in the process <br />of refinancing the mortgage company indicated they would not <br />process the refinance on more than 10 acres. Mr. Keefe is, <br />therefore, requesting permission to split 10 acres from the balance <br />of his site. The minimum lot size in an R -X District is 10 acres. <br />The 10 acres proposed to be split is located in the center of the <br />northern portion of the lot and would appear to be a landlocked <br />parcel. We would suggest that Mr. Keefe be required to provide an <br />easement, for roadway purposes, through the southern portion of the <br />lot, on the existing driveway, to insure access to the new parcel. <br />We would further recommend that this condition be waived, at this <br />time, to allow immediate recording of the subdivision for <br />refinancing purposes. Should Mr. Keefe decide to keep the parcels <br />separate and eventually sell the larger parcel, we would require <br />the easement to be recorded. Mr. Keefe has indicated that his only <br />interest in obtaining the subdivision is to satisfy his mortgage <br />company and that following the closing he will be rejoining the two <br />parcels for tax purposes. <br />OPTII <br />1. Approve minor subdivision with the condition that an easement, <br />for roadway purposes, be provided over the existing driveway to <br />service the newly created 10 acre parcel. (with a waiver of this <br />requirement unless the property should be offered for sale) <br />•2.: Return to staff for further consideration. <br />R cpwAENDATION <br />Option 1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.