02/09/1994 P&Z Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Search

Second, the proposal creates shared driveways for lots 24-27 to gain access to County Road 12, similar to what was approved on the North Side of Apollo Drive. This raises concerns over the potential for backing onto a busy County Road. Driveway turnarounds should be reauired on each of these four lots, to prevent potential traffic hazards. Also, access permits will have to obtained from Anoka County. If the shared driveway arrangement is approved, the shared access easements shall be executed and filed as part of the Final Plat. $Vt70Acke. The following table illustrates the minimum setback requirements within the R -I zoning district. All of the proposed lots located adjacent to County Road 12 do not meet the minimum front yard setback requirement of 40 feet to collector streets. The building pad locations should be adjusted to meet all City setback requirements. pegiired R-1 Setbcka Front Yard Front Yard Side Yard Rear Yard 40 Feet (Collector) 30 Feet (Local) 10 Feet 30 Feet aadina & Draina e., In accordance with subdivision regulations, the applicant has submitted a grading plan for review. The said plan will be subject to comment and approval by the City Engineer. Park Dedication. As a prerequisite to all plat approvals, the subdivider shall dedicate to the City or dedicate the public use, for park or playground purposes, for public open space or in lieu of a cash equivalent, as stipulated by the Lino Lakes Park Board. Landscapiig. In compliance with Ordinance requirements, a landscape plan has been submitted for review. The plans call for a berm constructed along the rear yards of lots which abut the Interstate freeway. The berm will be include planting of 8 foot high coniferous trees spaced 15 feet apart. Also ponds will be constructed along the rear yards. The proposed ponds, berm and trees will serve as a buffer from Interstate 35W. Utility Plan. As required by Ordinance, a utility plan has been submitted for review. The plan should be subject to comment and recommendation of the City Engineer. CONCLUSION Based on the preceding review, our office recommends tabling the application until the applicant apply for a rezoning of the property from R-4/PDQ to R-1, and a public hearing is scheduled.