07/21/1994 P&Z Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Search

PLANNING & ZONING BOARD June 8, 1994 Mr. Banta was present and stated that his closest neighbor has no objections to the request. He added that he could purchase an additional 20' or so from the neighbor and then have the additional square footage necessary to allow the proposed construction. However, his lot is large now, the storage building is screened by tall evergreen trees, and he would prefer the variance request. When the storage building was construction, in about 1983, it was a permitted use. (NOTE: the Accessory Building Ordinance prior to 1990 allowed an 800 square foot storage building on property from 1 to 2 1/2 acres in size in addition to an attached or detached garage). Kathy Nordine asked what the existing storage building was used for. Mr. Banta explained that he has a boat and motor home stored in the building. She also asked if he would be willing to remove that building to comply with the square footage requirements - he was not and added that you can not see the storage building from the street. Mr. Schones stated that Mr. Banta is to be commended for having such a well maintained property. However, he expressed concern at setting a precedent by granting this variance - we need to follow the rules we have established for the overall good of the community. There was some discussion concerning how this variance could be granted without setting a precedent. Planning Consultant Brixius indicated that if specific findings of fact are found that would be unique to this site it may be possible. Kathy Nordine suggested looking at the characteristics of the neighborhood - large lots, some over 1.25 acres which would allow the additional storage building, the fact that this is going from a two car garage to a three and three car garages are becoming more the norm. Chairman Schaps suggested that the P & Z take time to consider the request and what options are available and is it possible to approve without setting a precedent. After some discussion, Al Robinson made a motion recommending that Mr. Banta return to the July meeting to allow the P & Z time to consider his request. John Landers seconded the motion. All voted aye. Motion carried. B. 94-11-P, Trappers Crossing, Preliminary Plat/PD This item was continued from the May 11, 1994 P & Z Meeting. The Public Hearing was closed at the May meeting. Chairman Schaps asked if there were any additional comments from Staff. There were none. Mr. Corsan, representing Hokanson Development, stated that he was confused about the status of the PDO. He stated that the 2