08/10/1994 P&Z Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Search

PLANNING & ZONING BOARD July 21, 1994 Tom Mesich indicated that maybe the ordinance is too restrictive on the larger lots and possibly the City should considering loosening the regulations. Vice Chairman Robinson indicated that he agreed with Mr. Mesich and indicated that the Board needs to determine specific grounds for granting a variance. He also felt future variances should be dealt with one at a time, based on their particular circumstances. This is unique because prior to 1990 he could have constructed the addition with no variance. Rick Gelbmann asked how long it would take to revise the Ordinance. Mary Kay indicated 60-90 days or longer. He also expressed concern on setting a precedent in this case. Ed Schones stated that we do have a set of rules and until we change those rules it is imperative that we follow them. Mr. Banta can purchase the additional 20' from the neighbor and have adequate room to construct the proposed addition. It is important to me that I follow the guidelines we have. Chairman Robinson felt this particular lot size was overlooked at the time the ordinance was revised. John Landers indicated that he agreed with Mr. Schones and wondered how many variance we would have if this one is approved. Tom Mesich added that this variance request does not meet the requirements of the ordinance. If Mr. Banta is interested in having the ordinance changed, he should contact staff. Rick Gelbmann also agreed and indicated that we should set some procedure on how we handle variances - if it does not meet the criteria - it will not be granted. John Landers then made a motion to deny the variance. Ed Schones Seconded the motion. On roll call: Ayes: Gelbmann, Landers, Mesich, Nordine, Schones Nays: Robinson Motion carried to deny variance. Tom Mesich made a recommendation to the City Council that the P & Z feels the restrictions for accessory buildings on 1-2 1/2 acre lots are too restrictive and suggested that the Council consider expanding the square footage that is allowable. Rick Gelbmann seconded the motion with the request that it be expedited. Ayes: Gelbmann, Landers, Mesich, Nordine, Robinson Nays: Schones Motion carried. B. 94-11-P, Trappers Crossing, Hokanson Devel., Holly Drive Planning Consultant Brixius explained that Hokanson Development submitted a letter to the City Council requesting that their preliminary plat for a PDO, denied by the P & Z, be returned to the P & Z with a concept for an R -1X plat 2