Laserfiche WebLink
ISSUES ANALYSIS <br />Zoning. The subject property is zoned NB, Neighborhood Business which is intended to <br />provide for the establishment of local businesses which deal directly with the daily requirements <br />of the immediate neighborhood. Because the district does not make an allowance for single <br />family residential dwellings, Ms. Whitney's home is considered a legal non -conforming use. <br />As a legal non -conforming use, the single family residential land use can continue to exist on <br />the site in the same size and manner as it existed at the time the property was zoned NB, <br />Neighborhood Business. <br />Of initial consideration in Ms. Whitney's request is the appropriateness of the existing NB <br />zoning classification and whether such zoning is consistent with the City's long term planning <br />objectives for the area. It should be noted that the NB zoning of the property is consistent with <br />the City's Land Use Plan which suggests commercial use of the property in question. <br />If the City believes the existing commercial zoning of the property is inappropriate, change in <br />the City's Land Use Plan and a rezoning of the property to a residential designation would likely <br />resolve this issue. <br />If on the other hand, the City determines that the commercial zoning of the property is based <br />on sound planning principles and reflects the City's desired long range use of the property, the <br />City's non -conforming use provisions must be considered valid and should be enforced. <br />Non -Conforming Use. The intent and purpose of Section 4, Subd. 3, Non -Conforming Uses <br />and Structures of the Lino Lakes Zoning Ordinance is to phase out non -conforming land use and <br />facilitate their redevelopment to implement the City's ultimate land use goals. With this <br />objective in mind, the non -conforming use zoning standard prevents use expansion or substantial <br />investment in non -conforming properties to assist with their development. <br />According to Section 4, Subd. 3.(a) of the Zoning Ordinance, alterations may be made to a <br />structure containing non -conforming residential units when they will improve the livability <br />thereof, provided they will not increase the number of dwelling units or expand the existing <br />build of structure. While it is believed this provision includes a grammatical error, it is <br />understood to mean that the degree of non -conformity cannot be expanded. <br />This performance standard allows for some alteration of a non -conforming structure, such as a <br />building in the proper zoning district that does not conform to required setbacks. This section <br />would not accommodate Ms. Whitney's request. Because the proposed garage addition would <br />represent an expansion of the residential use (non -conformity), such expansion is not currently <br />allowed by Ordinance. The obvious intent of this provision is to perpetuate the phasing out of <br />the residential use of the property. <br />2 <br />