My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
06/12/1995 Council Packet
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
1982-2020
>
1995
>
06/12/1995 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/10/2017 10:52:23 AM
Creation date
7/7/2017 1:34:04 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Council Packet
Meeting Date
06/12/1995
Council Meeting Type
Regular
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
214
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
CITY COUNCIL CLOSED SESSION <br />CITY OF LINO LAKES <br />COUNCIL MINUTES <br />MARCH 8, 1993 <br />Staff members present: City Attorney, Bill Hawkins; City <br />Engineer, Darrell Schneider and Clerk -Treasurer, Marilyn <br />Anderson. <br />The purpose of the meeting was to update the City Council <br />regarding several pending matters of litigation. <br />BRAD RACUTT <br />Mr. Hawkins briefly outlined the reason the legal action was <br />started against Mr. Racutt. Recently Mr. Racutt visited the City <br />offices and demanded entry to the City Engineer's office and also <br />demanded copies of certain documents. Mr. Racutt was told that <br />he was to request information through his attorney. Mr. Racutts <br />attorney, Mr. Fritz Knaak then filed an action against the City <br />contending that Mr. Racutts civil rights were violated and asked <br />the court to compel the City to vacate an easement on the Racutt <br />property. The legal action is also requesting a dollar amount in <br />excess of $50,000.00. This action will be handled by the Citys <br />insurance company. The City must respond and file a brief. In <br />the interim, the City is continuing with the original action <br />against Mr. Racutt to get the septic system repaired and to <br />correct the excess dirt fill problem. <br />Mr. Racutt called the Building Inspector last week to say that he <br />wanted to bring in the new septic tank and put it in the back <br />yard before road restrictions are posted. The Building Inspector <br />referred the matter to Mr. Hawkins. Since the Rice Creek <br />Watershed District (RCWD) is now involved in the matter of the <br />drainage easement, this must be resolved before Mr. Racutt can <br />bring anything further onto his property. <br />PAGE 1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.