My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
06/12/1995 Council Packet
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
1982-2020
>
1995
>
06/12/1995 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/10/2017 10:52:23 AM
Creation date
7/7/2017 1:34:04 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Council Packet
Meeting Date
06/12/1995
Council Meeting Type
Regular
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
214
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
CLOSED COUNCIL MEETING NOVEMBER 18, 1993 <br />on the same cycle and all be renegotiated at the same time. Ms. <br />Olson said that it is better to deal with the units that have the <br />ability to strike first. If the package is reasonable there is <br />less of a chance for a strike. Then the City can go to the <br />arbitration groups and say this is what the striking unions settled <br />for. Mayor Reinert said that when a package is negotiated that <br />costs more than what is in the budget, this means that the City <br />cannot hire some new employees as proposed. <br />Ms. Olson said that she will be negotiating with the amount of <br />dollars that the City Council authorizes so this means that the <br />City Council must arrive at a general indication of the dollars <br />that are available and that can be distributed. She noted that she <br />will not propose a settlement that is not authorized. <br />Ms. Olson explained that this meeting is the first of several <br />meetings to get the City Council thinking about the approximate <br />size of the wage and benefit package and to prepare a plan for <br />distribution of the dollars. These figures are then put in the <br />computer and analyzed. Benefits need to be looked at since the <br />LLMA is seeking to improve their fringe benefits. Ms. Olson said <br />she wanted the City Council's input on this matter. Mr. Schumacher <br />also explained that there are dollars in the 1993 budget as well as <br />in the 1994 budget for this contract settlement. Ms. Olson <br />explained that the payline and the Pay Equity Plan will be kept in <br />mind as well as positioning for arbitration. She noted that the <br />final result must be reasonable and affordable. Ms.Olson said that <br />she will consider $50,000.00 as the amount available for settlement <br />of this contract and will re-evaluate her strategy after the <br />restructuring has become final. She will prepare some hypothetical <br />figures for the City Council to consider. <br />Mr. Tesch explained that job descriptions for persons in LLMA are <br />nearly completed, however he has not prepared any projections of <br />the dollars needed for each position. He will be talking <br />individually to each member of LLMA. <br />Council Member Bergeson asked Ms. Olson to give a general estimate <br />of how low salary and benefits are for the members of LLMA. She <br />explained that they would not be within 10%. She explained that <br />she will come back before the City Council and make some <br />projections. Ms. Olson also said she would focus on internal <br />relationships and take a position with an eye to the budget and an <br />eye to arbitration. <br />Council Member Bergeson asked how important it is to talk tough or <br />easy? Does this set the tone for future contracts? Ms. Olson said <br />that she would not be talking tough but rather rational. <br />PAGE 4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.