Laserfiche WebLink
COUNCIL MEETING APRIL 24, 1995 <br />increases also. The MSA designation can be assigned to either an <br />existing or non -existing roadway. <br />Before the State Aid Division of MnDOT will recognize MSA routes, <br />the routes must first be officially designated by the City <br />Council. The following revisions have been reviewed by the State <br />Aid Division of MnDOT and would be acceptable. <br />Resolution No. 95 - 54 Establishing Non -Existing Apollo Drive <br />from State Trunk Highway 49 to Lake Drive as a M.S.A.S. This <br />route would allow for the extension of Apollo Drive north of <br />Lilac Street ultimately connecting to Lake Drive. <br />Resolution No. 95 - 55 Establishing a Non -Existing Route from <br />Anoka Country Road 84 to County State Aid Highway 14 as a <br />M.S.A.S. This proposed route is located on the east side of I - <br />35E and would begin at Main Street, run south through a future <br />development area, and connect with Otter Lake Road. Although the <br />route is shown roughly midway between I -35E and Elmcrest, its <br />exact location can be',determined at some time in the future. It <br />may ultimately lie over'portions of Otter Lake Road and Cedar <br />Street depending on development activity in the area. <br />Resolution No. 95 - 56 Revoking Non -Existing Industrial Boulevard <br />from Apollo Drive to State Trunk Highway 49 as a M.S.A.S. In the <br />preliminary review of the Apollo Business Park development, the <br />construction of another north -south connection from Apollo Drive <br />to Lilac Street was considered. As development has evolved in <br />this area, it is becoming apparent that a single, larger parcel <br />will be more marketable than the much smaller parcels created by <br />another roadway connection. <br />Mr. Powell recommended that the City Council adopt the above <br />three (3) described resolutions to adjust the Lino Lakes MSA <br />System. <br />Council Member Kuether moved to adopt Resolution No. 95 - 54. <br />Council Member Elliott seconded the motion. Motion carried <br />unanimously. <br />Council Member Elliott moved to adopt Resolution No. 95 - 55. <br />Council Member Bergeson seconded the motion. Motion carried <br />unanimously. <br />Council Member Kuether moved to adopt Resolution No. 95 - 56. <br />Council Member Bergeson seconded the motion. Motion carried <br />unanimously. <br />Resolution Nos. 95 - 54, 95 - 55 and 95 - 56 can be found at the <br />PAGE 19 <br />