Laserfiche WebLink
COUNCIL MEETING APRIL 10, 1995 <br />reflect this change. The City of Lino Lakes must adopt this code <br />to provide for local enforcement. In addition, certain options <br />should be selected for inclusion in our local code. <br />Mr. Kluegel said it is a recommendation by himself and Fire Chief <br />Bennett that the 1995 Building Code be adopted with the following <br />options: reroofing standards, exposed residential concrete <br />standards, membrane structures standards and optional fire <br />protection systems (sprinklers). Mr. Kluegel outlined the first <br />three (3) options and Fire Chief Bennett outlined the optional <br />fire protection systems. Fire Chief Bennett explained that the <br />fourth option affects commercial buildings and is an enhanced <br />sprinkler system. He presented a chart showing how the system <br />operates and it almost allows the building to protect itself to <br />some degree and to minimize the need for the Centennial Fire <br />District to purchase large equipment in the future. It also <br />allows the Centennial Fire District to handle situations with <br />minimal fire loss and fire related deaths. Fire Chief Bennett <br />explained that he and Mr. Kluegel have met with Mr. Wessel and <br />made sure that what is proposed does not adversely affect his <br />effort in the area of commercial development. <br />Mr. Kluegel and Fire Chief Bennett recommended that the City <br />Council adopt the FIRST READING of Ordinance No. 05 - 95. <br />Council Member Kuether asked if all four (4) of the options <br />affect only commercial buildings. Mr. Kluegel said yes with the <br />exception of the exposed residential concrete standards option. <br />This obviously affects residential construction. <br />Council Member Neal asked if a business is not connected to <br />municipal water, must they comply with the new regulations. <br />Chief Bennett said yes. <br />Council Member Kuether moved to adopt the FIRST READING of <br />Ordinance No. 05 - 95 and dispense with the reading. Council <br />Member Neal seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. <br />CONSIDERATION OF RESOLUTION NO. 95 - 45 SETTING FEE FOR FENCE <br />PERMITS <br />Mr. Kluegel explained that in order to be consistent with our <br />neighboring communities and also cover all inspection costs, he <br />recommended that a set fee of $30.50 be established for fencing <br />permits in all zoning districts. Mr. Kluegel noted that <br />currently fence permit fees depend on the value of the fence that <br />will be installed. These fees appeared to be unusually high. He <br />conducted a survey of neighboring communities and felt that the <br />PAGE 15 <br />