Laserfiche WebLink
COUNCIL MINUTES AUGUST 14, 1995 <br />grading contractor has been very responsive and Mr. Corson was sure that these items will <br />be addressed. <br />Mr. Corson referred to the letter written by the attorney for Hokansons Development and <br />explained that although there has been an exchange of concerns, the development must <br />move ahead because there is a lot of equipment on the site costing Hokanson thousands of <br />dollars each day. The fence had to be moved expediently. Since there was no conclusion <br />after he and Ms. Walseth talked, he was not surprised that the letter had been sent by the <br />attorney. Mr. Corson also said that Mr. Hokanson would be participating in mediating on <br />this matter. He said that Mr. Hokanson is willing to work out a solution, however, the <br />solution may not be exactly what Ms. Walseth wants or what Mr. Hokanson wants. <br />Mayor Reinert noted the purpose for silt fencing and also noted the unusually heavy rains <br />this summer. He asked if additional support could be placed on the fencing in this area to <br />control runoff. Mr. Corson said that the area where the fencing washed out will be double <br />fenced. Within several days, the grading should be completed and the swale in place. <br />This area will collect sediment. The area will be double fenced until the swale is complete. <br />He also noted that there will be a gradual grade from the Walseth property. <br />Mr. Corson explained that the fence was not properly located on the Walseth property <br />prior to the Walseth's purchasing the property. This led the Walseths to believe that they <br />had more land than they actually had. Mayor Reinert explained that this is a civil matter <br />and the City cannot be responsible for the fence. <br />Council Member Elliott said she felt the silt fence should have been 100 percent in place <br />before any dirt was moved. She also said that this fence should be maintained daily. <br />Council Member Elliott also noted that when the project is completed the fence should be <br />removed. Mr. Powell explained that silt fence is left up until the vegetation is strong <br />enough to keep the soil from eroding. <br />Council Member Elliott asked about the Trapper's Crossing, Landscaping Agreement that <br />was included in the Council packets. Mr. Corson explained that this agreement was <br />arrived at during a meeting at the Walseth home. He explained that Hokanson <br />Development is willing to comply with the agreement. However another version of the <br />agreement prepared by Ms. Walseth is not what was agreed upon. The version in the <br />Council packet is not what was agreed on and that is why mediation is needed. <br />Caroline Dahl, 1101 Holly Court substantiated what Ms. Walseth said. She has taken <br />pictures of the soil erosion to document what is happening. Ms. Dahl explained that the <br />ditch is overflowing and is filled with dirt. There was no silt fencing in this area. She was <br />under the impression that silt fencing had to be in place before any grading was done. Ms. <br />Dahl also noted that there was no silt fencing in the area of the 15 foot drop-off which <br />washed away. She said that the excavating company was working in the rain so they <br />cannot say that they did not know the rain was coming. Ms. Dahl felt that the area where <br />the horses are is dangerous and could wash away. <br />PAGE 12 <br />