Laserfiche WebLink
4 <br /> <br />RYAN/TARGET/KOHLS ABATEMENT <br /> <br />Ms. Divine stated that the request for participation from Forest Lake School District and <br />Anoka County had been denied by both entities. Mr. Chase said EDAC should give some <br />consideration regarding the payback period of the abatement request. Ms. Divine said the <br />tax reform changes are dramatic and pushes the terms for payback out a lot longer. <br />However, TIF and abatement are still viable tools, and cities still have the charge of <br />economic development. Mr. Gorowsky said the tax savings should offset less abatement <br />dollars. <br /> <br />Mr. Rolek said that after this year, cities will be playing on a level playing field. Mr. <br />Wessel said Ryan’s plan is to sell out their part and move on. But with industrial projects <br />there is an option of giving them less or extending the length of payback. Mr. Rolek <br />explained the maximum that can be abated is 5% of the general levy, but the city’s <br />capacity will rise over time. Ms. Hansmann said the Ryan project will use a large portion <br />of what’s available and will limit other projects, including those in the Village. Mr. <br />Rolek said each year the city makes a payment on this project, it is freeing up capacity for <br />future use. Ms. Carlson said the city has to pay for services to the new projects. Mr. <br />Milbauer said bonds could be issued. Mr. Rolek said pay-as-you-go lowers the risk to the <br />city. Ms. Divine said the TIF projects out are in the range of 4-5 years payback. <br /> <br />Mr. Wessel asked for recommendation regarding making the severed piece available as <br />an incentive. Ms. Schwartz moved to approve using the severed piece as a tool in the <br />negotiations in the Ryan/Target/Kohl’s subsidy request. Mr. Gorowsky seconded the <br />motion. Motion passed unanimously. <br /> <br />Ms. Carlson said the city can control the subsidy issue, but has no control over the access. <br />The county does not want to allow the second access. The council approved a resolution <br />supporting the access and sent it to the county. <br /> <br />VILLAGE DEVELOPMENT- LETTER OF INTENT <br /> <br />Ms. Divine said a letter that outlined a schedule and city and developer responsibility was <br />approved by the city council. This will be the basis to develop a more binding agreement. <br /> <br />Mr. Juni said he appreciated getting the documents in advance to have the opportunity to <br />read them over. <br /> <br />Mr. Juni moved to adjourn. Mr. Gorowsky seconded the motion. Meeting adjourned. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />