Laserfiche WebLink
3 <br />Chaska: the city council is the EDA <br />Woodbury: the EDA is comprised of five citizens with finance backgrounds and two <br />council members. One member is a Fortis representative, since Fortis participates <br />financially in a revolving loan fund. All recommendations still go to the council for a <br />vote. <br />Cottage Grove: The EDA is comprised of residents, up to two business persons that are <br />not residents, and two council members. The EDA acts as the contracting body, i.e., it <br />approves the development agreements, but the city council approves the business <br />subsidy, so the council has overriding authority. <br />Shakopee: The council is the EDA. <br /> <br />Ms. Schwartz indicated she believed that in Cambridge, Chisago City and Forest Lake, <br />the citizens are the EDA. Mr. Chase stated he believes EDAC should remain advisory, <br />and not be making decisions involving the city’s purse strings. He noted many issues go <br />to the council before they come to EDAC. It doesn’t seem relevant for EDAC to respond <br />when the council has already made up its mind. Timing can be a problem. Ms. Divine <br />said many issues have plenty of opportunity for EDAC discussion. Mr. Chase stated <br />EDAC can do more to be proactive. Ms. Divine noted that the EDAC plan calls for <br />identifying areas for redevelopment as they occur. Changes are occurring on this portion <br />of Lake Drive, and that is why redevelopment is being studied. <br /> <br />Ms. Schwartz stated she would bring up the issue of EDAC becoming the EDA in the <br />future. <br /> <br />Ms. Divine stated that the council asked for an update of TIF districts, which she will <br />share with EDAC next month. Ms. Schwartz questioned if any money from the TIF <br />districts could go to EDAC to fund projects. Ms. Divine stated the money from the TIF <br />districts benefited economic development, i.e., new businesses, and the purpose was to <br />get businesses on the tax rolls. Ms. Carlson stated the five-year financial plan shows a <br />deficit. Mr. Chase said EDAC hadn’t identified a need or a benefit for having funds to <br />work with, and if EDAC did identify a reason for needing funding, then a request could <br />go to the council to be considered. Mr. Gorowsky noted that TIF was a financial tool that <br />has been used, and now the city will be seeing the rewards of that investment, which is a <br />good thing, and helped us meet the mission statement. Ms. Divine stated it also helps <br />long term stability, part of the mission. As businesses go on the tax rolls, the city can <br />afford to look at new investment opportunities. <br /> <br />Ms. Divine reviewed the EDAC goals and progress made toward creating the balance of <br />commercial and residential. She asked Ms. Schwartz if she and Mr. Hicks could get an <br />update at the next meeting regarding the Design Review Task Force. <br /> <br />Ms. Carlson stated that the city’s five-year plan includes a city survey. <br /> <br />Meeting adjourned. <br /> <br />