Laserfiche WebLink
ordinance to other lands, structures, or buildings in the same <br />district. Should the City determine to grant this variance <br />request, stipulations could be made that other properties with <br />similar circumstances, loss of acreage due to highway <br />construction, could be considered for similar variance <br />requests. <br />E. That the proposed actions will not unreasonably diminish or <br />impair established property values within the neighborhood. <br />Property values should not be adversely affected with the <br />granting of this variance. Property to the north can be <br />platted at 5 acre minimums (in Columbus Township) while <br />property to the south is at 10 acre minimums. Additionally, <br />there is a 5 acre parcel immediately south of this property. <br />F. That the proposed actions will be in keeping with the <br />spirit and intent of the ordinance. The spirit and intent of <br />the Ordinance is to provide for large parcels that can be <br />further divided when utilities are available. The purpose and <br />intent of the ordinance would remain in tack should this <br />variance be granted. <br />The Planning and Zoning Board reviewed this item at their June 14, <br />1995 meeting and recommended Option No. 1 which denys the variance <br />request and allows a subdivision of two lots (one 10 acres in size, <br />the other 19.4 acres in size). Mr. Brixius advised the Board that <br />the public action to condemn the I -35W property could be used to <br />justify the variance request. <br />Mr. Meredith was unable to attend the P & Z meeting, however, since <br />that time he has advised me that he owns 12.5 acres of property <br />immediately north of this parcel, located in Columbus Township. He <br />asked if it would be possible to add .6 of an acre from those 12+ <br />acres to the Lino Lakes property and thereby meet the 10 acre <br />minimum requirement. I have spoken with the County Assessors <br />Office and they indicated that the County would not allow the <br />separation of any property that would stradle taxing jurisdiction <br />lines (municipality, school district, or watershed district). <br />OPTIONS <br />1. Deny subdivision of property into three parcels. Approving a <br />split of the property into one 10 acre parcel and one 19.4 acre <br />parcel. Two Park Dedication fees shall be required for the newly <br />created lots to be collected at the time the Deed is signed by the <br />City for Recording with the County. ($500 per lot) <br />2. Approve variance to allow two 10 acre parcels and one 9.4 acre - <br />parcels for the reason indicated above in items B, D, E, F. Three <br />Park Dedication fees shall be required for the newly created lots, <br />to be collected at the time the Deed is signed by the City for <br />Recording with the County. ($500 per lot) <br />3. Return to Planning & Zoning Board for further consideration. <br />RECOMMENDATION <br />Option 1, concur with the Planning & Zoning Board Action <br />