My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
08-07-2017 Council Packet
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
1982-2020
>
2017
>
08-07-2017 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/8/2018 11:10:08 AM
Creation date
8/8/2017 12:09:49 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Council Packet
Meeting Date
08/07/2017
Council Meeting Type
Work Session Regular
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
261
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
RELEVANT LINKS: <br />League of Minnesota Cities Information Memo: 1/4/2016 <br />Regulating Peddlers, Solicitors and Transient Merchants Page 5 <br />The bond is conditioned on the merchant conforming to all laws relating to <br />transient merchants, complying with all material oral or written statements <br />and representations made in regard to merchandise offered for sale, as well <br />as on the faithful performance of any warranties made with the merchandise. <br />Minn. Stat. § 329.13. <br />Minn. Stat. § 329.17. <br />When goods are brought into the state by a nonresident and it is claimed that <br />such stock is to be sold at reduced prices, it is considered prima facie (“on its <br />face”) evidence that the person (partnership or corporation) selling those <br />goods is a transient merchant. Anyone acting in violation of these <br />requirements is guilty of a gross misdemeanor. <br />Minn. Stat. § 329.15. Minn. <br />Stat. § 412.221, subd. 19. <br />Minn. Stat. § 437.02. <br />In addition, statutory and home rule charter cities have the specific authority <br />to adopt ordinances to regulate, control, and license transient merchants, as <br />well as provide criminal penalties for violating city regulations. <br />State ex rel. Greenwood v. <br />Nolan, 108 Minn. 170, 122 <br />N.W. 255 (1909). State v. <br />Schmidt, 280 Minn. 281, 159 <br />N.W.2d 113 (1968). <br />Licensing or other city ordinances regulating transient merchants must apply <br />uniformly to all transient dealers regardless of residence, locale, or <br />otherwise. <br />94 A.L.R. 1076. A volume of legal authority recognizes classifications based on the <br />temporary nature of transient merchants as valid, and finds that it is proper <br />to distinguish between temporary enterprises and permanently established <br />businesses. <br />D.Commercial vs. non-commercial <br />In addition to categorizing conduct as peddling, soliciting, or transient <br />merchant sales, these activities also need to be evaluated as to whether they <br />are commercial or non-commercial in nature. <br />See LMC information memo, <br />Public Nuisances. Often, the action or conduct is a nuisance and possibly a violation of city <br />ordinance. In reality, it is not that easy to define community concerns and <br />tolerances. To illustrate the practical differences involved, consider: <br />•The resident, unbothered when non-profits ring the doorbell selling <br />candy bars, but infuriated when a vacuum salesperson comes calling. <br />•The resident, who doesn’t mind the vacuum salesperson who maintains <br />an office on Main Street, but doesn’t want to be disturbed by similar <br />salespersons who live and work in another city, county, or state. <br />•The resident who pretends to be out whenever a member of a particular <br />religious group knocks on the door, just wanting to talk about their <br />beliefs, but opens her door when the parish priest or pastor stops by <br />seeking donations for the church’s latest initiative.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.