My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
2016-003 Council Ordinances
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Ordinances
>
2016
>
2016-003 Council Ordinances
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/15/2017 3:15:18 PM
Creation date
8/11/2017 10:01:43 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Ordinances
Meeting Date
06/13/2016
Council Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
(d) Lawful gambling; <br />(e) Special event; <br />(f) Peddler, solicitor, transient merchant; <br />(g) Taxicab; <br />(h) Pawnbroker, precious metal dealers, secondhand good dealers; and <br />(i) Adult uses (sexually -oriented businesses). <br />(53) Criteria for rejection. Except for the positions set forth in M.S. § 364.09, as <br />it may be amended from time to time, the city will not reject an applicant for a license on <br />the basis of the applicant's prior conviction unless the crime is directly related to the <br />license sought and the conviction is for a felony, gross misdemeanor or misdemeanor <br />with a jail sentence. If the city rejects the applicant's request on this basis, the city shall <br />notify the applicant in writing of the following: <br />(a) The grounds and reasons for the denial; <br />(b) The applicant complaint and grievance procedure set forth in M.S. § 364.06, <br />as it may be amended from time to time; <br />(c) The earliest date the applicant may reapply for the license; and <br />(d) That all competent evidence of rehabilitation will be considered upon <br />reapplication. <br />Adopted by the Lino Lakes City Council this 13 day of June , 2016. <br />The motion for the adoption of the foregoing ordinance was introduced by Council <br />Member Kusterman and was duly seconded by Council Member Rafferty and <br />upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: <br />Kusterman, Rafferty, Maher, - anthey, Reinert <br />The following voted against same: <br />none <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.