08-06 2014 Charter Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Search

(4/5) majority vote of the City Council. B. Consideration of the ' mprovements may then proceed in accordance with Minn. Sstat. Chapt.x 429,e law through the public hearing on the pio cct. a peried. After the close of the public hearing, the City Council shall wait a minimum of sixty (60) days Ceuucil en tl,c prvposid improvLmcnt.before ordering the improvement(s). [Editorial note: modified to more closely follow the language of Chapter 429.] C. Affected property owners opposed to additional improvements may, within this sixty-day period, file with the city clerk a petition or written objection to any or all of the additional improvements. . • If any additional improvement which is objected to by the greater of (a) 25% of the affected property owners, or (b) one more affected property owner than signed consents to the additional improvement(s), then the City Council inayshall not specially assess that additional improvement unless such additional improvement is approval-efed by a majority of the voters voting on the question at a general or spccial election. The ballot shall generally describe the proposed additional improvement(s), the estimated principal amount of any bonds to be issued to finance the public improvement(s) and the estimated percentage of total debt service on the bonds expected to be paid from ad valorem taxes. [Editorial note: reworded to clarify, but still contain the intent of existing charter section 8.04, subdivisions 1 and 2. The special election option was removed as requested] D. If the voters do not approve an additional improvement(s) and ,suancc of • • . • . . - - - • . - . • • . . • . t • , • • • 1 J Cat. 475.58, subd. l a shall apply., the City Council shall not vote on the same improvement within a period of one (1) year after the public hearing on said improvement. [Editorial note: modified to match existing charter section 8.04, subd. 4.] Section 8.03. (As provided in City Council proposal 03-14.) Section 8.04. (As provided in City Council proposal 03-14.)