My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
11-06-2014 Charter Packet
LinoLakes
>
Charter
>
Packets
>
1981 - 2021 Packets
>
2014 Packets
>
11-06-2014 Charter Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/22/2021 7:32:20 PM
Creation date
8/14/2017 12:56:39 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Charter Commission
Charter Meeting Type
Regular
Supplemental fields
Date
11/6/2014
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
32
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Charter Commission <br />July 10, 2014 <br />Page 3 <br />91 <br />92 Commissioner Storberg noted that when the Charter was created that clause was added. <br />93 <br />94 Commissioner Turcotte stated that the first sentence clearly states that the Commission can <br />95 propose amendments. <br />96 <br />97 Commissioner Bartsch referenced the additional language, which follows that beginning <br />98 statement regarding the need to have a petition of voters. <br />99 <br />100 Vice Chair Timm provided further clarification explaining that the Commission can propose <br />101 amendments on their own but they would have to move the amendment forward if there was a <br />102 petition from voters. She explained that if information is not included in the Charter, the <br />103 language found in State Statute would apply and noted that the Charter could be more restrictive <br />104 than State Statute in some instances. <br />105 <br />106 MOTION by Commissioner Bretoi, seconded by Commissioner Lyden, requesting call the <br />107 question. <br />108 <br />109 Motion passed 12-1. (Bartsch opposed) <br />110 <br />111 Motion failed 2-11. (Aldentaler and Lyden aye) <br />112 <br />113 B. April 10th Motion <br />114 <br />115 i. Motion Stated that the Commission Reserve the Right to Re -Approach the <br />116 Council for an Additional $3,400 <br />117 ii. Pending Discussion — Scope of Work <br />118 <br />119 Commissioner Bretoi questioned the amount of time that would be allowed to move this forward <br />120 if the additional funding is obtained. <br />121 <br />122 Vice Chair Timm believed the deadline would be August 11th. She noted that Attorney Marty <br />123 was present on April 10th and answered specific questions regarding the proposed amendments <br />124 from the City Council. <br />125 <br />126 Commissioner Johnson asked for additional clarification on the budget of the Commission and <br />127 the additional amount requested. <br />128 <br />129 Vice Chair Timm reported that the Commission has a budget of $1,500 and noted that those <br />130 funds could only be used for the Commission to frame an amendment and cannot be used for this <br />131 purpose. She noted that the City Council did approve $600, which was used to fund the <br />132 discussion with Attorney Marty at the April 10th meeting. She explained that the original request <br />133 for funding had been in the amount of $4,000 and advised that the Council did not authorize that <br />134 amount. She advised that the motion made by the Commission to accept the $600 included the <br />135 clause that the Commission reserved the right to ask for the remaining funds requested. <br />3 <br />Packet Page 4 of 25 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.