Laserfiche WebLink
Charter Commission <br />January 14, 2016 <br />Page 3 <br />89 Acting Chair Dahl stated that the Council had stated before that the proposed amendment would <br />90 not be compliant with the State statute and if that language were to meet the statute, the item <br />91 could be on the ballot. <br />92 <br />93 Commissioner Turcotte stated that the City Council does not have a review of a proposed <br />94 amendment because they could then hold the item off the ballot. He noted that the Commission <br />95 does have the ability to review amendments proposed by the Council because they do not have <br />96 power to hold the item off the ballot. He stated that during the past year the Commission worked <br />97 on a proposed amendment to create wards, using models from Blaine and St. Paul. He provided <br />98 a brief overview of wards and their intent. <br />99 <br />100 Commissioner Stranik stated that it appears that item was moved along the previous year and <br />101 then dead -ended because of the lack of legal counsel. He asked if a new action would be needed <br />102 at this meeting, noting that he is not sure that he would support wards. <br />103 <br />104 Acting Chair Dahl stated that she had been given the direction at the last meeting to pursue the <br />105 services of the League of Minnesota Cities, if possible, for assistance in the amendment <br />106 language. <br />107 <br />108 Commissioner Stranik asked if the Commission, as it stands today with the new members, would <br />^109 need to endorse the amendment before that could move forward. <br />10 <br />111 Commissioner Devaney provided background information on the League of Minnesota Cities <br />112 and the dues that are paid annually by municipalities to the organization for their services. He <br />113 stated that perhaps the document should be further clarified to spell out the assistance that could <br />114 be given by the League outside of the $75 per hour charges. He also believed that the question <br />115 brought forward by Commissioner Stranik, regarding whether or not the action would need to be <br />116 voted on by the Commission membership as it stands today, is a good question and noted that <br />117 perhaps the League could provide clarification on that as well. <br />118 <br />119 Commissioner Bretoi stated that the decision had been made by the Commission the previous <br />120 year that even though not all of the Commission members supported the ward amendment, the <br />121 item should still move forward and be placed on the ballot to allow the residents to make the <br />122 decision. <br />123 <br />124 Commissioner Johnson asked the amount the Commission was paying Attorney Marty for her <br />125 services. <br />126 <br />127 Acting Chair Dahl stated that Attorney Marty was charging $140 per hour but noted that she also <br />128 worked many unpaid hours as well. <br />129 <br />130 Commissioner Storberg stated that the Commission only has a budget of $1,500 per year. She <br />31 stated that perhaps the group could do a consensus vote on whether or not they support the <br />132 action. <br />133 <br />3 <br />