Laserfiche WebLink
BOARD OF REVIEW MINUTES April 9, 2012 <br /> APPROVED <br /> CITY OF LINO LAKES <br /> 2 MINUTES <br /> 3 BOARD OF APPEAL <br /> 4 <br /> 5 DATE : April 9,2012 <br /> 6 TIME STARTED : 6:04 p.m. <br /> 7 TIME ENDED : 6:35 p.m. <br /> 8 MEMBERS PRESENT : Council Member Stoesz, Roeser,Rafferty, <br /> 9 O'Donnell and Mayor Reinert <br /> 10 MEMBERS ABSENT : none <br /> 11 <br /> 12 Staff members present: City Administrator Jeff Karlson; Finance Director Al Rolek; Public Safety <br /> 13 Director John Swenson; City Clerk Julie Bartell <br /> 14 <br /> 15 The council received the 2012 Assessor's Report from Anoka County. <br /> 16 <br /> 17 Anoka County Assessor Linda Weiner noted the purpose of the meeting as included in the posted <br /> 18 official notice: to hear appeals from property owners about the current year valuation of their <br /> 19 property. She noted that the Board can make decisions related to the appeals they hear and can make <br /> 20 changes to property valuations (within certain limits). The purpose of the meeting is not to discuss <br /> 21 property taxes. She noted that Council Member Roeser has received the required training for the <br /> 22 Board of Appeal process. <br /> 23 <br /> '24 Ms. Weiner noted that the only property owners present are a group from the Bald Eagle Lake area. <br /> 25 She called their representative to come forward. <br /> 26 <br /> 27 John Kulas, 6110 West Bald Eagle,noted that not all affected properties owners were able to attend. <br /> 28 He distributed some written information regarding their appeal. He recalled for the council that the <br /> 29 properties in question are split between taxing jurisdictions in Lino Lakes (Anoka County) and Hugo <br /> 30 (Washington County) and as a result are not being fairly valued. The mayor noted that the council <br /> 31 had the opportunity to review the facts around these properties at their most recent work session so all <br /> 32 council members should understand the background of this appeal. Mr. Kulas explained that the lots <br /> 33 in question are unbuildable next to the lake (that is the portion in Washington County). They would <br /> 34 like a value reduction and he is presenting information in his handout to support that action, including <br /> 35 overall drops in property values, sales information on like properties, and a newspaper add indicating <br /> 36 asking prices for like properties. He has also provided information showing one of the property's <br /> 37 history of taxes and data that was provided in the past. Information was also provided on properties <br /> 38 in Ham Lake. It is their opinion that the properties are not being taxed on the basis of land only. An <br /> 39 unidentified property owner added that the case that they are trying to make is that their valuations are <br /> 40 higher than what they should be for just that land in Washington County; they are frustrated that the <br /> 41 county won't recognize that. They recognized that Anoka County Assessor Linda Weiner has done a <br /> 42 good job working with them and their concern is mainly with Washington County. Mayor Reinert <br /> 43 noted that Anoka County reduced its share of the property by 10% last year and this year the land <br /> 44 value is down 13%. A fair approach would be a valuation that would stand as if these properties <br /> 45 were located fully in one county. Ms. Weiner explained that she has had contact with Washington <br /> 1 <br />