Laserfiche WebLink
COUNCIL MINUTES May 14, 2012 <br /> APPROVED <br /> 90 city has looked at the streets proposed, more review indicated the streets in the Pheasant Hills <br /> 91 neighborhood would not benefit from sealcoating. Those streets were pulled off and replaced with <br /> 92 the next streets on the list. The proposed list is approximately 12 miles at a cost of about $316,000, <br /> 93 somewhat over the budget planned for sealcoating this year but proposed to be handled with overage <br /> 94 funds that have accumulated. The cost will be clarified once bids are received and a final low bid <br /> 95 accepted. <br /> 96 <br /> 97 The council discussed with staff the possibility that other streets are in the same condition as Pheasant <br /> 98 Hills and how that will be addressed for pavement treatment. The council also asked that staff add <br /> 99 the plans for future roadwork on the Website. <br /> 100 <br /> 101 Council Member O'Donnell moved to approve Resolution No. 12-36, as presented. Council Member <br /> 102 Roeser seconded the motion. Motion carried on a unanimous voice vote. <br /> 103 <br /> 104 6B) Resolution No. 12-37,Approving Plans and Specifications and Authorizing Advertisement <br /> 105 for Bids for the 2012 Street Overlay Project—City Engineer Wedel explained that the city also <br /> 106 implements a street overlay program each year based on the city's Pavement Management Plan. This <br /> 107 year's project is Leonard Avenue and Bradley Street, originally planned for mill and overlay. Now, <br /> 108 after more review of the street, it has been determined that a reclamation project is more appropriate. <br /> 109 The reclamation involves pulling up the street, grinding that product down, and reusing that product <br /> 110 to pave the street. The cost of the project is fully included in the existing budget. The council <br /> 111 confirmed that the residents on that street will be well informed and issues minimized during any <br /> 12 construction period. <br /> 113 <br /> 114 Council Member Roeser moved to approve Resolution No. 12-37 as presented. Council Member <br /> 115 Stoesz seconded the motion. Motion carried on a unanimous voice vote. <br /> 116 <br /> 117 6C) Resolution No. 12-42,Approving Amendment to the I-35W/CSAH 14 Joint Powers <br /> 118 Agreement with Anoka County regarding Lilac Street Improvements—City Engineer Wedel <br /> 119 reported that staff is proposing an amendment to the city's joint powers agreement with Anoka <br /> 120 County relative to Lilac Street. The city has authorized that Lilac Street be included in Anoka <br /> 121 County's reclamation program, at the city's cost but with savings due to being a part of a larger <br /> 122 program. The funds are available mainly through funds given to the city from the county when Lilac <br /> 123 Street was taken back from them. <br /> 124 <br /> 125 Council Member Rafferty moved to approve Resolution No. 12-42 as presented. Council Member <br /> 126 Roeser seconded the motion. Motion carried on a unanimous voice vote. <br /> 127 <br /> 128 6D) Resolution No. 12-41,Approving a Municipal State Aid (MSA) Funding Advance, <br /> 129 I35W/Lake Drive and I35E/CSAH 14 Interchange Improvements—City Engineer Wedel <br /> 130 explained the request for an MSA advance. The request is based on communication from the <br /> 131 Minnesota Department of Transportation indicating advance of funds would be appropriate and to <br /> 132 make funds on hand for cities to utilize. The city's MSA funds for the future are mainly devoted to <br /> 133 payment for improvements to interchange projects in the city. <br /> L34 <br /> 3 <br />