Laserfiche WebLink
Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2010 15:12:01 -0500 <br />Subject: Charter Mtg: Simplified Roberts Rules -Agenda item for next meeting <br />From: clsutherland©gmaii.com <br />To: denali2010@q.com; talkette@yahoo.com <br />Chair Dahl/Secretary Gunderson, <br />Please share this communication with the other commissioners. In reviewing and trying to create a <br />simple reference sheet for use in our meetings utilizing Robert's Rules more effectively, I discovered that <br />the `motion to divide question' is used to consider the motion more carefully, however it requires a <br />'second', is not debated, can be amended and does require a majority vote to move forward -none of <br />which was followed. <br />The correct motion would have been to, "object to consideration of the question given my rationale of <br />the item in question not being on the agenda", which does not require a second, is not debated, can not <br />be amended and requires a 2/3 vote. The action would have been for the chair to immediately take the <br />vote by asking, "Shall the question be considered?" the meeting would then continue based on the <br />outcome of that vote. <br />Attached are two documents that attempt to hone in on those items most commonly used or misused, a <br />small grid of common motions, their order of ranking, and how they are handled by the assembly. <br />I am requesting time on the agenda, prior to business items to review these items with the assembly. <br />This will provide an opportunity for open dialogue to fully understand the impact and importance of <br />utilizing these motions correctly. The end goal as cited from my RR book "is that a group of people get <br />together, thoroughly discuss the issue, fix the objectionable parts, and reach a conclusion". <br />I apologize for introducing a not commonly used motion incorrectly last night, and look forward to <br />working from a shared understanding at our meetings going forward. <br />Also from my new understanding, the referendum item should not have been included in the business <br />portion of the agenda as it did not relate to the workings of the assembly but rather was 'open <br />discussion' which could be placed before business items. (Each business item, old or new, on the agenda <br />is considered a proposed motion). However, this may be an item to review with a parliamentarian, as <br />there were other questions about the agenda. <br />Thank you for your time, cordially, <br />Commissioner Sutherland <br />My Strengths are: Relator, Strategic, Individualization, Command and Achiever. <br />"Success is not final, failure is not fatal: it is the courage to continue that counts", Winston Churchill. <br />"Nothing in this world can take the place of persistence. Talent will not; nothing is more common than <br />unsuccessful people with talent. Genius will not; unrewarded genius is almost a proverb. Education will <br />not; the world is full of educated derelicts. Persistence and determination alone are omnipotent. The <br />slogan "press on" has solved and always will solve the problems of the human race", Calvin Coolidge. <br />